Message from 🎭🎵 in Nick Fuentes Server #realpolitik

2018-01-16 07:15:12 UTC  

my innitial take aways from the Wohl vs. Fuentes debate:
1. I think Wohl enjoyed himself - enjoyed the challenage
2. He was consulting some resource from his computer
2b. But because he did not know Nick's position prior to the debate & because many of the points Nick used were never broadcasted on his show there is no way he prepared the resource himself
2c. I suspect the consulted resource was some ADL talking points to argue popular (((conspiracy theories)))
3. I don't think Wohl is aware of ZOG
3b. There were some things (like the nuclear program) that he might know about but I don't think he knows the full extent of it
3c. Because Wohl believes honestly that anything Nick suggests is unsubstantial he is confident that the debate will go in his favor
4. It looked like Wohl heard anti-Israel points he had never heard before
4b. Might have the effect of red pilling Wohl on Israel if even a little bit
5. Trump has met Wohl personally so via grape vine there is a chance that Trump might see the debate or at the least hear about it

2018-01-16 10:06:10 UTC  
2018-01-16 10:06:14 UTC  
2018-01-16 12:43:51 UTC  


2018-01-16 12:43:55 UTC  

fuck off shlomo

2018-01-16 14:24:44 UTC  
2018-01-16 14:25:04 UTC  
2018-01-16 14:25:09 UTC  
2018-01-16 14:27:32 UTC  
2018-01-16 14:27:52 UTC  


2018-01-16 14:28:01 UTC  

@epic blaze is a brainlet

2018-01-16 14:28:32 UTC  

I am much smarter than him

2018-01-16 14:28:42 UTC  

'he screwed up the timeout role

2018-01-16 19:56:46 UTC  

Immigrants are more likely to have a university degree than natives, but, according to data from the OECD college-educated immigrants have skills much closer to those of natives who *just finished high school*.

2018-01-16 20:11:47 UTC  

if immigrants who has a university degree should be let in no matter what, then it becomes "anyone has graduated from a college in the world can become us citizens"

2018-01-16 21:54:51 UTC  

@Huge Brain Oliver Imo the best way to argue for lower immigration is to promote high skill immigration instead of low skill immigration. You have to consider our interests and politics of immigration as it stands currently.

More wealthy immigrants are less likely to have replacement level birthrates. So the indian guy who comes here on an H1-B visa is less likely to have a kid than a Mexican coming here through and H2-B visa or coming in illegally.

If we were to put our support behind things like the RAISE Act ( we would be able to cut immigration levels in half, and be able to mitigate the effects of demographic replacement of whites, while at the same time protecting white blue collar workers from a loose labor market

2018-01-16 21:56:25 UTC  

yes raise act

2018-01-16 22:00:21 UTC  

I mean high quality immigrants still have assimilation problem and we cannot have too many

2018-01-16 22:13:55 UTC  

if it gets to the point where our doctors are getting replaced by foreign doctors that's a problem that is BIGGER than anyone taking a lowskilled labor job

2018-01-16 22:14:57 UTC  

the law should let people in based off of demand for people for whatever sector, they have predictons for which sectors are going to grow and which ones arent. They can also forsee a need for more people in x field, as we see now in a demand for computer science and eldery care

2018-01-16 22:24:21 UTC  

@🎭🎵 You have to understand this though, there's always going to be a high demand for foreign labor if that labor is cheaper than the native alternative. Like with H2-B's for instance, there isn't a massive shortage of labor supply in the H2-B sector, yet there is such a high demand. The reason why? Nine of the top 10 sectors occupied by H2-B workers have had stagnant or declining wages for the past two decades

I'd also argue that low skill natives being replaced and having their wages fall is the worst thing that can happen, low skill workers are generally low income earners as well. If you take away their source of income or diminish it, you're hurting people who need it the most. As opposed to a middle or upper class white collar worker who has a fairly good income

2018-01-16 22:29:27 UTC  

a limited amount is ok but importing a master class will be worse

2018-01-16 22:31:13 UTC  

especially many newcoming investement bankers, doctors, silicon valley elites, media personals have more allegience to their own tribe/country of origin than America

2018-01-16 22:31:28 UTC  

not only economy matters

2018-01-16 22:33:42 UTC  

I agree, my end goal is to end immigration entirely, but you have to cut the branches before you cut the whole tree.

Immigrants of all classes have allegiance to their own group, it's just low skill immigrants who have more children, i.e. creating more democrat voters.

2018-01-16 22:40:51 UTC  

We could have a payment-based soft eugenics program to breed more high-IQ whites to serve those roles.

2018-01-16 22:51:34 UTC  

Get rid of the visa program

2018-01-16 22:51:34 UTC  


2018-01-16 22:51:40 UTC  

cmon fella

2018-01-16 22:51:47 UTC  

people are having to retrain their replacements

2018-01-16 22:51:50 UTC  

its horrible

2018-01-16 23:12:04 UTC  

@Gregory Malchuk An open eugenics program in the United States is highly unrealistic, the public still associates anything with eugenics to nazism

@🎭🎵 I'm for cutting immigration worker programs as much as possible, at the current rate though we take in around 1.3 million immigrants a year. Only 1 in 15 are here because of their skills, it's better to take in high skill immigrants with low birth rates than to take in low skill ones with high birth rates

2018-01-16 23:30:40 UTC  

SOFT eugenics. Like child payments scaled based on the IQ of the parents.

2018-01-16 23:36:22 UTC  

@Gregory Malchuk You really think government officials would allow that though? You've gotta have your policies grounded in reality here.

2018-01-16 23:37:09 UTC  

It is aspirational. A longer term goal.

2018-01-16 23:44:48 UTC  

immigration law should be based on a fliexible set of rules instead of something set it stone

2018-01-16 23:45:05 UTC  

which I mean it kinda is, I just dont like the idea of a bill not adapting to changing times

2018-01-16 23:45:35 UTC  

if the bill says to take in doctors 10 years before and now our doctors are getting displaced we should be able to retweak who we let in withoutr having to pass a bill through congress

2018-01-16 23:45:48 UTC  

which I think is already the case consitutionally it just isnt done