Message from @Anon
Discord ID: 428331552729202690
lol they're slowly being forced to confront the reality of race
from /pol anon:
But this is what he was saying the whole time, he can't get shit done and needs his people to win in the midterms. This shit right here proved his point.
Democrats shot themselves in their own foot with this bill. What seems to be wekness right know can be used against all people responsible for this before the midterms. He can support his people by calling out the people who voted for this bill. Democrats and Republicans.
I see no other comfortable option in this situation. He got some money approved and can get shit done that people will see. He know has the military on his side, a veto would have probably pissed them off. He can start building the wall. And all the liberal bullshit that got approved he can delay, use the law against it (for example sanctuary cities), highlight the problems not inlcuded in the bill (especially DACA is going to hurt the Dems).
Considering his position he was in I think it was the right choise to sign it.
But if somebody has a different opinion I would like to hear it.
Thoughts?
no. i think trump was very misguided by his loyalty to the military. it was important for him to get that money for north korea but the bill did literally nothing else good. jordan lebanon egypt and tunisia get border security money. we get $1.6 bill that says explicitly the money CANNOT BE USED for concrete wall. US taxpayer money for scholarships in lebanon. LEBANON.
in no way was trump signing this some sort of strategic victory. the only thing is that if he vetoed it it’d shut the govt down and start all new ugly budget negotiations, which you could consider good or bad, maybe an unneeded distraction rn. ryan and mcconnell deserve 100x the blame trump does but it would have been powerful if he vetoed
trump has been talking a lot about how our border apparatus has to be “see through” so you can see what’s on the other side. he’s said that more than just a couple times lately. i really hope he’s not trying to justify fencing in areas where there should be a wall
>voting for obama ever
Opinion | John Paul Stevens: Repeal the Second Amendment - The New York Times
https://apple.news/AnN4OmhmyTTOAYm2WrIqrng
what a faggot
yes
Today is a rough day for the left wing narrative
First they get abolish the 2nd amendment trending
Now they are crying about saint dindu the armed felon pedo who was killed by cops and now the blacks are calling for gun control for the police
that's a bit self-serving in a sinister way
Disarm police, disarm law-abiding whites
This is personally my favorite take
it is great
let them start the war
so it is on them
the problem is, those people know they cannot win so their best strategy is emotional manipulation
they will never leave or riot for real
In what world is that not a fucking nightmare
England is a mess
....
Who's ready for the invasion of England after the American civil war?
BIG IF TRUE
The boomer is a mad man. Think of this: gen Z has been pushed into an unnatural world. We’ve been brainwashed and conditioned since the time we were born. We were thrust into a world that we inherently disagree with. We’re told that our human nature is wrong and that we need to suppress it. And some buy into the hedonism. For some the monotony of being a worker bee and getting physical stimulus is enough. They can tell their nature that they don’t have to abide by God’s law. They can keep getting suppressed emotionally, mentally, physically, metaphysically, and spiritually and just carry on. They do their drugs and drink and have sex and their sins help them cope with the satanic world they were thrust into. But who creates this world? Who made it so that children cannot play cops and robbers? Where teenagers cannot flirt without being called sexual harassers? Where adults cannot go to church without being bigots? The boomer. These boomers must be mad men. That or they are suicidal. They create this world order that is poisonous to good nature, yet they believe that the fruits of their labor will never fall near them. We already see some breaking under the pressure. Why not shoot up a school when the institution is anti-intellect? Why not bomb a movie theater when it is the gathering of hedonistic masses? Why live in a world that restricts your life? Many young men are facing this crisis. But I ask to examine the boomer that created this world. Do they think that they will never be targeted? Do the Ted Kennedy’s and Henry Kissinger’s believe that their retirement home is safer than a school? Are they over confident, or do they not care? Are they sure the system will not fail, or do they wish to burn with the world they destroyed? These boomers must be examined and questioned. Their motives are inhuman, and possibly this is the answer. The anti humanistic supernatural. This is possible. But we must question and challenge the rootless boomer wherever he lurks.
Pin this
What is to be done: Boomer edition
Did you make this @Broseph or did you find it somewhere