Message from Reactionary in #FedsShallRiseAgain! #keep-it-simple-plan
well what should we feed to the game reform hawks
I mean I wish that atlasia is more about ideology
Yess also we should check everything we get accomplished. I can type up passing the farm bill, loosening some burdensome regulations that aren’t for keeping workers safe, etc. Perhaps a declaration addressing inactivity, and maybe an adoption encouraging bill.
Fixing social security and taxes is easier than youd think
yeah, we need to fix those things
I’ll add that hold up my dudes
What would be in the adoption bill?
The broad strokes of my platform were
bill of rights
It would be stuff like what I introduced in the South. Have an ad campaign encouraging adoption instead of abortion, and outlaw partial birth abortion. It would be like getting temporary vouchers to raise a child for a time period, too. I may need to rewrite that law. But yes
My 1 concern on the abortion thing is
I think the Supreme Court
said it was a state only issue
yeah the court has a pro-choice majority
and the fed govt cant regulate abortion
that was oakvales campaign point
was he made abortion a regional issue
Alright, well we strike the abortion thing out
The Keep it Simple Plan:
Recently, Senators LouisvilleThunder, Senator Reactionary, and myself have come up with a plan that Atlasia desperately needs. It’s to be named the “Keep it Simple Plan” because that’s exactly what it’ll do. We have many policies we would like to push forward, for our vision of a better, and more simple Atlasia.
Protecting and preserving the Atlasian Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Pass Pay-go in the Senate.
Shoot for a balanced budget amendment.
A private investigation into government wasteful spending.
Fix Social Security.
Reform the tax system.
A federal “jobs.gov” website.
Protecting workers’ rights.
Getting rid of burdensome regulations that don’t protect the Atlasian worker.
Regulating out of control drug prices.
Encouragement of private investment in the clean energy sector.
Encouragement of non-interventionism unless when threatened.
A protection of the Vice Presidency.
Would "non-interventionism unless threatened" include when our allies are threatened?
eminent domain reform
If there’s a threat against an ally
Not that I have any say, of course. :P
We’ll respond accordingly, it’s a threat against us. And I mean I would love your response to this my dude. Also yes
Eminent domain reform
it all depends on the situation given by the gm
we need to be foreign policy realists
Yeah, but I believe saying that In the plan would win over voters. Of course we would be realists and not back down if say.. China attacked our allies or something.