Message from Deleted User in #FedsShallRiseAgain! #fremont-feds


2018-10-25 23:13:58 UTC  

@Deleted User What If I only want to strike down parts of the original act.

2018-10-25 23:14:10 UTC  

I don't want to get rid of the bump stock ban.

2018-10-25 23:14:30 UTC  

1. Part XXX of The Gun Reform Act are repealed

2018-10-25 23:14:54 UTC  

XXX is whatever parts of the act you want it to be

2018-10-25 23:15:34 UTC  

Good.

2018-10-25 23:17:11 UTC  

@Deleted User How to notate parts of a section?

2018-10-25 23:17:28 UTC  

Explain

2018-10-25 23:17:35 UTC  

I want to strike down 2 through 5 of section 2 of a bill.

2018-10-25 23:17:41 UTC  

Section 2: Regulations
1. The sale and use of bump stocks in Fremont is hereby illegal.
***2. No state is allowed to prohibit the sale and use of assault weapons.***
***3. No state is allowed to have more than a seven day or less than a 72 hour waiting period before acquiring a gun.***
***4. No state is allowed to ban less than 15 rounds of ammunition.***
***5. Gun manufactures should not be held accountable if an individual commits or attempts to commit a crime with a gun, provided the gun was acquired in a legal way.***

2018-10-25 23:18:18 UTC  

@Deleted User How would I word a repeal of only the bolded parts of section 2.

2018-10-25 23:18:26 UTC  

That is, 2., 3., 4. and 5.

2018-10-25 23:19:09 UTC  

1. Section 2.2 -2.5 of the Gun Reform act are hereby repealed

2018-10-25 23:19:39 UTC  

Good.

2018-10-25 23:35:29 UTC  

I am proud to be introducing a Fremont Assault Weapons Ban.

2018-10-25 23:35:29 UTC  

AN ACT
To ban Assault Weapons.

Quote
Section 1: Title

1. This act may be cities as the Fremont Assault Weapons Ban Act.

Section 2: Repeal

1. Section 2.2 - 2.4 of the Gun Reform Act are hereby repealed, namely-
Quote
2. No state is allowed to prohibit the sale and use of assault weapons.
3. No state is allowed to have more than a seven day or less than a 72 hour waiting period before acquiring a gun.
4. No state is allowed to ban less than 15 rounds of ammunition.

Section 3: Assault Weapons Ban

1. The manufacture, sale, possession and use of Assault Weapons within the Commonwealth of Fremont is hereby illegal.

2. The sale and use of silencers or suppressors on guns in Fremont is hereby illegal.

Section 4: Implementation
1. This act shall be implemented immediately.

2018-10-25 23:46:46 UTC  

This bill is unconstitutional

2018-10-25 23:47:12 UTC  

@Deleted User We'll cross that bridge when we come to it.

2018-10-25 23:47:19 UTC  

Actually, how is it unconstitutional?

2018-10-25 23:48:17 UTC  

It violates section 7 of the bill of rights (aka the atlasian version of the 2nd amendment)

2018-10-25 23:48:33 UTC  

@Deleted User But it's only Assault Weapons.

2018-10-25 23:48:55 UTC  

And the real-life AWB wasn't unconstitutional.

2018-10-25 23:49:04 UTC  

Even if it wasn't passed.

2018-10-25 23:49:38 UTC  

@Reactionary Thoughts?

2018-10-25 23:49:46 UTC  

Oh lmao

2018-10-25 23:49:55 UTC  

Mr. R would hate this bill

2018-10-25 23:50:02 UTC  

I know he will.

2018-10-25 23:50:02 UTC  

More than anyone in here

2018-10-25 23:50:19 UTC  

However he is always the one who points out how something is unconstitutional.

2018-10-25 23:50:46 UTC  

So after he tells me why it is unconstitutional, I can revise it to so that it passes constitutional muster.

2018-10-26 00:10:33 UTC  

@Reactionary So what are the legal problems with an assault weapons ban?

2018-10-26 03:24:23 UTC  

100% guarantee he won't help a bad bill pass

2018-10-26 03:24:54 UTC  

that's always been something he stood by

2018-10-26 03:25:56 UTC  

^^^

2018-10-26 04:15:10 UTC  

@YoungTexan How much do you hate my gun control bills?

2018-10-30 02:53:56 UTC  

@Deleted User Just checking something,

2018-10-30 02:54:16 UTC  

How supportive of gun control are JGibson and Griffin?

2018-10-30 02:54:42 UTC  

They love gun control­čśŤ

2018-10-30 02:55:06 UTC  

So the only leftist in the house with any problem with gun control is Jimmy?

2018-10-30 02:55:21 UTC  

I guess so

2018-10-30 03:13:59 UTC  

@Deleted User Where do you think Canis and Sestak would sit on this bill?