Message from Deleted User in #FedsShallRiseAgain! #fremont-feds


2018-10-25 22:46:21 UTC  

Yes I believe so not 100% sure

2018-10-25 22:54:59 UTC  

A RESOLUTION
That this house calls on the federal government to institute tighter Gun Control.
Quote
Whereas, current levels of gun crime and violence in Atlasia are the highest in the western world.
Whereas, the federal government has done nothing to combat this crisis.
Resolved, that the Commonwealth of Fremont calls on the federal government to institute tighter gun control measures.
Further Resolved, that such measures should include mandatory background checks on buyers of firearms.
Further Resolved, that such measures should include a federal gun registry with complete retroactivity.
Further Resolved, that such measures should include a complete ban on the manufacture, sale and possession of automatic and semi-automatic firearms.
Further Resolved, that such measures should include a complete ban on the carry of firearms for the purpose of self-defence without a permit.

2018-10-25 22:58:14 UTC  

Such a bill would most likley be unconstitutional

2018-10-25 22:58:39 UTC  

@Deleted User I am calling on the federal government to introduce such measures.

2018-10-25 22:58:49 UTC  

They can deal with constitutional issues.

2018-10-25 23:01:11 UTC  

Meanwhile I'm now drafting a bill to repeal our Gun Reform act.

2018-10-25 23:01:30 UTC  

Main aim is a complete ban on Assault Weapons within Fremont.

2018-10-25 23:01:36 UTC  

manufacture, sale and possession

2018-10-25 23:12:29 UTC  

@Deleted User If I want to pass conflicting legislation do I have to first repeal the conflicting legislation?

2018-10-25 23:12:54 UTC  

Namely, a Fremont Assault Weapons ban

2018-10-25 23:12:55 UTC  

Probably best but you can do so in the same bill

2018-10-25 23:13:06 UTC  

@Deleted User What is the best way to word it.

2018-10-25 23:13:58 UTC  

@Deleted User What If I only want to strike down parts of the original act.

2018-10-25 23:14:10 UTC  

I don't want to get rid of the bump stock ban.

2018-10-25 23:14:30 UTC  

1. Part XXX of The Gun Reform Act are repealed

2018-10-25 23:14:54 UTC  

XXX is whatever parts of the act you want it to be

2018-10-25 23:15:34 UTC  

Good.

2018-10-25 23:17:11 UTC  

@Deleted User How to notate parts of a section?

2018-10-25 23:17:28 UTC  

Explain

2018-10-25 23:17:35 UTC  

I want to strike down 2 through 5 of section 2 of a bill.

2018-10-25 23:17:41 UTC  

Section 2: Regulations
1. The sale and use of bump stocks in Fremont is hereby illegal.
***2. No state is allowed to prohibit the sale and use of assault weapons.***
***3. No state is allowed to have more than a seven day or less than a 72 hour waiting period before acquiring a gun.***
***4. No state is allowed to ban less than 15 rounds of ammunition.***
***5. Gun manufactures should not be held accountable if an individual commits or attempts to commit a crime with a gun, provided the gun was acquired in a legal way.***

2018-10-25 23:18:18 UTC  

@Deleted User How would I word a repeal of only the bolded parts of section 2.

2018-10-25 23:18:26 UTC  

That is, 2., 3., 4. and 5.

2018-10-25 23:19:09 UTC  

1. Section 2.2 -2.5 of the Gun Reform act are hereby repealed

2018-10-25 23:19:39 UTC  

Good.

2018-10-25 23:35:29 UTC  

I am proud to be introducing a Fremont Assault Weapons Ban.

2018-10-25 23:35:29 UTC  

AN ACT
To ban Assault Weapons.

Quote
Section 1: Title

1. This act may be cities as the Fremont Assault Weapons Ban Act.

Section 2: Repeal

1. Section 2.2 - 2.4 of the Gun Reform Act are hereby repealed, namely-
Quote
2. No state is allowed to prohibit the sale and use of assault weapons.
3. No state is allowed to have more than a seven day or less than a 72 hour waiting period before acquiring a gun.
4. No state is allowed to ban less than 15 rounds of ammunition.

Section 3: Assault Weapons Ban

1. The manufacture, sale, possession and use of Assault Weapons within the Commonwealth of Fremont is hereby illegal.

2. The sale and use of silencers or suppressors on guns in Fremont is hereby illegal.

Section 4: Implementation
1. This act shall be implemented immediately.

2018-10-25 23:46:46 UTC  

This bill is unconstitutional

2018-10-25 23:47:12 UTC  

@Deleted User We'll cross that bridge when we come to it.

2018-10-25 23:47:19 UTC  

Actually, how is it unconstitutional?

2018-10-25 23:48:17 UTC  

It violates section 7 of the bill of rights (aka the atlasian version of the 2nd amendment)

2018-10-25 23:48:33 UTC  

@Deleted User But it's only Assault Weapons.

2018-10-25 23:48:55 UTC  

And the real-life AWB wasn't unconstitutional.

2018-10-25 23:49:04 UTC  

Even if it wasn't passed.

2018-10-25 23:49:38 UTC  

@Reactionary Thoughts?

2018-10-25 23:49:46 UTC  

Oh lmao

2018-10-25 23:49:55 UTC  

Mr. R would hate this bill

2018-10-25 23:50:02 UTC  

I know he will.

2018-10-25 23:50:02 UTC  

More than anyone in here

2018-10-25 23:50:19 UTC  

However he is always the one who points out how something is unconstitutional.

2018-10-25 23:50:46 UTC  

So after he tells me why it is unconstitutional, I can revise it to so that it passes constitutional muster.