Message from Deleted User in #FedsShallRiseAgain! #fremont-feds
It violates section 7 of the bill of rights (aka the atlasian version of the 2nd amendment)
@Deleted User But it's only Assault Weapons.
And the real-life AWB wasn't unconstitutional.
Even if it wasn't passed.
@Reactionary Thoughts?
Oh lmao
Mr. R would hate this bill
I know he will.
More than anyone in here
However he is always the one who points out how something is unconstitutional.
So after he tells me why it is unconstitutional, I can revise it to so that it passes constitutional muster.
@Reactionary So what are the legal problems with an assault weapons ban?
100% guarantee he won't help a bad bill pass
that's always been something he stood by
^^^
@YoungTexan How much do you hate my gun control bills?
@Deleted User Just checking something,
How supportive of gun control are JGibson and Griffin?
They love gun control😛
I guess so
@Deleted User Where do you think Canis and Sestak would sit on this bill?
Idk
It is a bad bill tho
*In your opinion.
Yes, gun control is bad and dumb
*In your opinion.
And it's good in your opinion
Yes.
That is why I support these measures, while you oppose them.
I think it's a bit disingenuous that you're focusing so hard on this issue when you did not campaign on it, or even disclose those views at any point prior to getting elected
In fact, this was your focus on the campaign:
"To sum up, If you elect me I shall focus on two areas; Tax Cuts and Infrastructure spending. And indeed, I shall get stuff done in these areas for the people of Fremont."
@Deleted User I'm extremely pragmatic.
When I discover an area of concern, that becomes my Number 1 priority.
Why focus on gun control though
right away their are lots of other possible priorities
During research on current statue I was extremely alarmed at the complete lack of any gun control.
That became a major concern to me.
And became my number 1 priority.
-