Message from The Eternal Anglo in Nice Respectable People Group #general

2018-10-03 16:29:10 UTC  

Maybe but red white and blue has the advantage of being meaningful to everyone whereas a teal triangle is also boring and conveys nothing to practically everyone

2018-10-03 16:29:11 UTC  

@Asatru Artist - MD It would be much easier to attract funding and humam capital if we rebranded. If we think that's optics cucking, we will always be a fringe group.

2018-10-03 16:29:17 UTC  

Changing the IE logo wouldn't get any of the Leftist outlets to stop calling us white supremacists.

2018-10-03 16:29:40 UTC  

they aren't concerned with media, they want more people

2018-10-03 16:29:44 UTC  

It would only end up confusing the normies and have boring civnats trying to get in our organization.

2018-10-03 16:29:45 UTC  

i just want the *right* people

2018-10-03 16:29:49 UTC  


2018-10-03 16:30:01 UTC  

@Asatru Artist - MD Who just wants more people?

2018-10-03 16:30:02 UTC  

I should mention, that Generation Identity uses a Greek symbol, with a Black/Yellow aesthetic, and they are doing **amazing** all over Europe

Because they carry themselves incredibly well, and prove the name slandering wrong

2018-10-03 16:30:04 UTC  

@Rabbidsith But it might stop conservative outlets from doing it

2018-10-03 16:30:04 UTC  

but in all seriousness, a rebrand doesn't have to be drastic.
for example, i've never been keen on the color teal and think red, white, and blue would have been better choices to catch the "pro-american" types

2018-10-03 16:30:14 UTC  

@Virgil Nah. They're all cucked.

2018-10-03 16:30:32 UTC  

we'll only have sympathetic media attention when these outlets literally have no choice.

2018-10-03 16:30:49 UTC  

but to accept us and our ways

2018-10-03 16:30:52 UTC  

i guess if we can get a ton of civnat tier whites in to give us more capital to work with to spread our message, and leadership stays the course, its whatever...

2018-10-03 16:30:54 UTC  

parts of the organization's imagery could slowly be swapped out

2018-10-03 16:31:09 UTC  

Even if you compare our optics to those of GI, the latter uses an ancient, but bold color scheme with regal origins (black and gold), whereas notwithstanding my own fondness for our color scheme, it's kind of fashwave-esque, and therefore specific to a particular time and subculture.

2018-10-03 16:31:10 UTC  

@Goose that's what I'm worried about

2018-10-03 16:31:16 UTC  

@Asatru Artist - MD Why not have them just donate to us? <:teehee:381917632359563264>

2018-10-03 16:31:53 UTC  

but a rebrand shouldn't concern any members because the foundation and structure of the IE network will remain intact.
does putting on a new hat change who's wearing it?

2018-10-03 16:32:00 UTC  

@Bjorn - MD Our logo is also ancient, Germanic, and uses a nice, modern aesthetic tho

2018-10-03 16:32:28 UTC  

@Rabbidsith Tucker isn't cucked and Breitbart has a large following that could potentially support us

2018-10-03 16:32:56 UTC  

We need to maintain our own brand. That in itself has meaning and recognition

2018-10-03 16:33:08 UTC  

@Goose yes, the minute you put on a MAGA hat, you go full fasc, put on an antifa hat, you go full soy <:teehee:381917632359563264>

2018-10-03 16:33:25 UTC  

@Virgil Yeah but the rest of Fox is cucked and Breitbart isn't going to support us until we have a lot more power.

2018-10-03 16:33:28 UTC  

Agreed, but the lambda is far more well-known and recognizable, and right or wrong (wrong), Greco-Roman semiotics occupies a position of greater notability and prestige than Germanic, even in Germanic Europe, and Germany itself.

2018-10-03 16:33:36 UTC  

I'm afraid people will associate an "Explicitly American group wanting to defend it's borders and maintain a White majority" with another group. It's to easy to make the comparison if we were explicitly American

2018-10-03 16:34:44 UTC  

Rebranding would lose what name recognition we have, make our already printed stickers and flyers unusable, and seem like we gave up who we are to court civnats.
The only reason to rebrand is if we somehow lose the C-ville lawsuit, imo

2018-10-03 16:34:47 UTC  

@The Eternal Anglo Only if we develop our own unique lexicon, and insist that every word therein begin with the same consonant, lol.

2018-10-03 16:34:53 UTC  

I doubt that these people are going to give a shit until we have 10,000 members.

2018-10-03 16:35:35 UTC  

*the mainstream media

2018-10-03 16:35:37 UTC  

@Rabbidsith Right but the question is how do we get more power, by getting investors and capital. Which would be much easier if we had a name that was more marketable to the average American and potential investors.

2018-10-03 16:35:40 UTC  

they already give a sh*t and we have around 1000....

2018-10-03 16:36:11 UTC  

The face of us being a fraternity for European Americans, not only is that a great description of us, but it also negates any comparison people may want to make of us to nasty 1.0 organisations. It's very cunning and sly

2018-10-03 16:36:26 UTC  

@Virgil I agree that we need investors and capital. However, losing what little brand recognition we have isn't conducive to that end.

2018-10-03 16:36:40 UTC  

@Virgil Well most of our money is going to the Cvill lawsuit, but once that's done and over with, it's easy flying

2018-10-03 16:36:51 UTC  

Evropa is also American because LARPing as Romans is an American tradition dating back to the founding fathers

2018-10-03 16:37:25 UTC  

toga toga toga!

2018-10-03 16:37:27 UTC  

Like I said, I'm not married to any particular means. If you think about things from another perspective, Generation Identity was a pretty unprecedented brand, and required a healthy amount explanation itself. Even if we were to retain the same title, though, at bare minimum, the color scheme would probably have to evolve over time.

2018-10-03 16:37:47 UTC  

We're paying off a lawsuit **and** still doing huge events all around the Country, I'd say we're doing *just* fine on capital.

Monetary capital is not the only thing we need, social capital as well. Rebranding would make us lose one of the two essential buildings blocks we need to succeed to power.

2018-10-03 16:38:38 UTC  

...and the Dragon's Eye is probably too esoteric. There are plenty of recognizably American symbols that are pretty edgy.