Message from Rabbidsith in Nice Respectable People Group #general
@Asatru Artist - MD Same here. We'd be retaining the same leadership and standards, though.
see, changing the v to a u i could get behind
I don't know. I like the V.\
Because I’ve never given it any thought
Even if we are optics cucks, it's important not to distance ourselves too far from Charlottsville because otherwise you might invite people into our organization that won't appreciate it.
I'm going to say it: Red, white, and blue.... is **Boring.**
Regardless of the situation, our name will eventually be slandered again.
i'm in favor of renaming the group *Amerimutts United* with a rainbow powerfist as our symbol
literally every politician uses red/white/blue for their logos.
It literally doesn't matter.
It would just have to be the overall palette. Nothin' says we couldn't spruce it up with a little originality here and there...
Just needs to be recognizably American.
Maybe but red white and blue has the advantage of being meaningful to everyone whereas a teal triangle is also boring and conveys nothing to practically everyone
@Asatru Artist - MD It would be much easier to attract funding and humam capital if we rebranded. If we think that's optics cucking, we will always be a fringe group.
Changing the IE logo wouldn't get any of the Leftist outlets to stop calling us white supremacists.
they aren't concerned with media, they want more people
It would only end up confusing the normies and have boring civnats trying to get in our organization.
i just want the *right* people
I should mention, that Generation Identity uses a Greek symbol, with a Black/Yellow aesthetic, and they are doing **amazing** all over Europe
Because they carry themselves incredibly well, and prove the name slandering wrong
but in all seriousness, a rebrand doesn't have to be drastic.
for example, i've never been keen on the color teal and think red, white, and blue would have been better choices to catch the "pro-american" types
we'll only have sympathetic media attention when these outlets literally have no choice.
but to accept us and our ways
i guess if we can get a ton of civnat tier whites in to give us more capital to work with to spread our message, and leadership stays the course, its whatever...
parts of the organization's imagery could slowly be swapped out
Even if you compare our optics to those of GI, the latter uses an ancient, but bold color scheme with regal origins (black and gold), whereas notwithstanding my own fondness for our color scheme, it's kind of fashwave-esque, and therefore specific to a particular time and subculture.
@Asatru Artist - MD Why not have them just donate to us? <:teehee:381917632359563264>
but a rebrand shouldn't concern any members because the foundation and structure of the IE network will remain intact.
does putting on a new hat change who's wearing it?
@Bjorn - MD Our logo is also ancient, Germanic, and uses a nice, modern aesthetic tho
@Rabbidsith Tucker isn't cucked and Breitbart has a large following that could potentially support us
We need to maintain our own brand. That in itself has meaning and recognition
@Goose yes, the minute you put on a MAGA hat, you go full fasc, put on an antifa hat, you go full soy <:teehee:381917632359563264>
@Virgil Yeah but the rest of Fox is cucked and Breitbart isn't going to support us until we have a lot more power.
Agreed, but the lambda is far more well-known and recognizable, and right or wrong (wrong), Greco-Roman semiotics occupies a position of greater notability and prestige than Germanic, even in Germanic Europe, and Germany itself.
I'm afraid people will associate an "Explicitly American group wanting to defend it's borders and maintain a White majority" with another group. It's to easy to make the comparison if we were explicitly American
Rebranding would lose what name recognition we have, make our already printed stickers and flyers unusable, and seem like we gave up who we are to court civnats.
The only reason to rebrand is if we somehow lose the C-ville lawsuit, imo