Message from @folk

Discord ID: 390230281270853633


2017-12-12 19:49:52 UTC  

It looks like they went with most rookie and cheapest lawyer they could find

2017-12-12 19:49:52 UTC  

candid, that's a youtuber?

2017-12-12 19:49:53 UTC  

WHAT THE FUCK

2017-12-12 19:49:58 UTC  

Is htat serious

2017-12-12 19:50:28 UTC  

Candid was an app that the armored shecler shilled

2017-12-12 19:50:30 UTC  

@folk candid was a app/social media that paid people in the "sketpic" community to shill for it

2017-12-12 19:50:39 UTC  

ah yes I remember now, thank you

2017-12-12 19:50:47 UTC  

like armored sketpic and mrrepzion

2017-12-12 19:51:32 UTC  

Candid was the "free speech chat platform" that fucked ArmouredSkeptic, Shoe0nHead and Amazing Atheist into signing a NDA to never talk about the advertising money they got, to shill for Candid.

2017-12-12 19:51:54 UTC  

made them suck real big dicks

2017-12-12 19:52:02 UTC  

Naked ape jewed them tho

2017-12-12 19:52:13 UTC  

really good move on his part

2017-12-12 19:52:20 UTC  

HarmfulOpinions destroyed them, Candid CEO tried to doxx HO, tried to harass his mother.

2017-12-12 19:52:38 UTC  

yep

2017-12-12 19:53:57 UTC  

seems they got fucked by the community, judging by their reddit :P

2017-12-12 19:54:17 UTC  

"Where is candid?????"
"It doesn't exist no more"

2017-12-12 19:54:27 UTC  

Oh yes, they burned down hard.

2017-12-12 19:54:33 UTC  

excellent

2017-12-12 19:55:47 UTC  

Shoe0nMouth even started banning people that mentioned Candid or HO on Greg's YouTube comments.

2017-12-12 19:56:07 UTC  

decompiled candid code

2017-12-12 19:57:51 UTC  

anyway neither davecullen or basedmama seem to have made any videos responding to the NC/NDA stuff, but it's safe to presume this is handled entirely by some idiot lawfirm

2017-12-12 19:58:16 UTC  

including distributing and retrieving the signed documents

2017-12-12 20:01:08 UTC  

I think you would have to look at the NC/NDA first

2017-12-12 20:01:38 UTC  

That is completely normal if they are too be paid for the services on a 1099 basis

2017-12-12 20:02:09 UTC  

Huh

2017-12-12 20:03:07 UTC  

It depends on the wording of what they signed

2017-12-12 20:03:36 UTC  

I have never seen a 1099 based employment that did not have a noncompete or a non disclosure

2017-12-12 20:06:28 UTC  

Very interesting dank

2017-12-12 20:08:16 UTC  

To me it sounds like he is trying to find drama where there is none. Or he does not understand the terms of the NC/NDA

2017-12-12 20:14:24 UTC  

can they be payed by a US entity if they travel under a standard B1 visa?

2017-12-12 20:15:35 UTC  

Tim spoke at other events, never had to sign those. AFAIK the speakers are not getting paid.

2017-12-12 20:16:03 UTC  

They're spending their own money to attend.

2017-12-12 20:16:58 UTC  

afaik travel expenses for international guests are non-taxable business expenses anyway

2017-12-12 20:17:24 UTC  

so it's mostly a question of actual payment for services

2017-12-12 20:18:14 UTC  

Are they not being paid?

2017-12-12 20:18:31 UTC  

Or reimbursed for travel?

2017-12-12 20:19:55 UTC  

And the only other point unless he posts the wording of the document it is impossible to know the meaning of the NDA or the NC

2017-12-12 20:25:09 UTC  

>Edit: And having just read the NC, **it's demanding** none of the speakers be speakers for **any other convention** for **12 months**, starting 30th December. So yeah, that's a big red flag, not even REAL conventions do that, couple that with a 3 year NDA & I'm going to predict right now that this entire scam is going to be a fly by night money making scam.