Because they have more money

because they get tax breaks

for doing it

plus that doesn't mean they're always virtuous

Why do islamists kill more Americans despite committing less attacks?

Doesn't that defeat the purpose then?

I'll tell you what I am.

I am pan-demisexual (which means I am attracted to men, women, and people who don't identify as man or woman - hence the "pan" part; and demi which means I'm only attracted to people once I have an emotional connection with them), and also I would consider gender to be an arbitrary social construct, so I generally consider myself genderqueer or non binary.

I also consider myself to be a social democrat, because I think that system of economics is most appealing.

I would also consider myself to be an atheist, and a determinist, because I don't believe that god exists, and I don't believe that human beings have free will.

I guess you could say that I'm a furry because I find some furry artwork very well done, and adorable.

I also like anime.

Copypasta?

what defeats the purpose of what

If greed and self-interest benefits the society the most

obviously some self interest is necessary

@Deleted User But they don't

but charity doesn't mean that the rich don't put their capital to socially destructive purposes

They benefit the individual

or put their capital to measures that give them more power than the poor

lol durtle

As a percentage of their income, they give back the most by far

why does that matter

Because it defeats your argument

no it doesn't

And blacks, by percentage of population, commit the most violent crimes by far

it doesn't mean that they don't ultimately chose to organize society in a way that helps them more

All the ghettos are owned by democrats as well @banestrum

i wonder why a ghetto would vote democratic lol

lol

You should wonder why and how Democrats create ghettos

@Deleted User And it's in the self interest of those democrat ghetto owners to keep those ghettos poor, so they can forever dangle the prospect of economic improvement in front of their captive audience of voters

And yet that's not the socially optimal income

and their donors

Societies create the most socially optimal outcomes when the structure of the society incentivizes or forces making socially optimal choices

I.E. rome

Behave or we crucify you

They think these groups need the most help and end up subsidizing bad behavior.

Yup

ted cruz voice: blackies, i'd just like to say......i really like ya!

We think we can throw money at problems to fix them which only makes them worse

not always but sometimes that is the case

That's my issue with Globalism

It thinks money is the be all and end all solution in ALL situations, which it is not