That's not a moral argument for the non vegan position @nic

Of course it's not, it's a shitpost you absolute unit

Who wants the debate?

Nonveganism is as immoral a position as not contributing to the field of researching synthetic meats.

Absolute cancer.

For the time being the nonveganism is a necesity for large part of the population that need nutrients

Anyone want the debate?

@Trebjonn Incorrect .

Who wants the debate?

the vegan diet is not suitable for everyone on the earth

or economically feasible

So you're asking for input on a debate, and you're calling everyone's responses cancer and incorrect.

Trebjonn is correct here

1st argument is incorrect 2nd argument isn't an argument that can demonstrate your position as moral.

No he isn't.

So you would rather people starve or get malnutrition?

I'm looking for someone to accept the proposition, take the con of the prop and debate.

Ok, if Trebjonn isn't correct, you need to do a bit more than say "no he isn't" to change my mind

@Trebjonn Appeal to futility fallacies aren't arguments .

Y needs to do X therefore X is justified in all contexts across the board.

Saying an argument isnt an argument without a counter argument

Its an appeal to futility.

Nobody wants the debate?

Your argument was an assertion and irrelevant to your position being moral/immoral

Are you willing to debate us?

2-3 letters plz

I'm not responding

Unless you'll debate on vv

Vc

who is "us"

The royal us

he's king of the potatoes

The US of A

2V2

Who is supposed to be on your side of the argument

The vegetable police.

I find it weird how many people show up here specifically to debate veganism

Because it's a serious ethical issue.

Its growing quite rapidly

A lot of people find pleasure in telling others how superior they are, morally speaking.

@Mal Some dont.