Message from @Trebjonn
Discord ID: 427410248865677333
Carl is the "are you kidding me" fag.
The woman was exactly like that.
Must be his mom.
"The apple never rots far from the tree."
Matilda is a classic.
Seriously though that women and the people around her are retarded, they danced around answering the question as much as possible
"you think it's a right you need but ya don't"
Anyone from this server wan debate veganism with me and a friend. 2v2.
Voice chat
PM for link.
Whats there to debate?
Proposition: Veganism logically follows from bootstrapping moral value towards humans and is a moral position. Nonveganism contradicts a belief in human moral value and is an immoral position.
The bro had gone to sleep for now.
Just looking for some future debate.
we are carnivorous animals, i am happy to end the debate there
I spy a Charlie Kirk tweet...
Honestly, a Yes/No answer is what I'm looking for.
Not a retarded claim on our biological nature.
Tasty meat
I am all for veganism when we can perfectly clone everyone on the planet for meat
<:pepe_smug:378719408341909506>
That's not a moral argument for the non vegan position @nic
Of course it's not, it's a shitpost you absolute unit
Who wants the debate?
Nonveganism is as immoral a position as not contributing to the field of researching synthetic meats.
Absolute cancer.
For the time being the nonveganism is a necesity for large part of the population that need nutrients
Anyone want the debate?
@Trebjonn Incorrect .
Who wants the debate?
the vegan diet is not suitable for everyone on the earth
or economically feasible
So you're asking for input on a debate, and you're calling everyone's responses cancer and incorrect.
Trebjonn is correct here
1st argument is incorrect 2nd argument isn't an argument that can demonstrate your position as moral.
No he isn't.
So you would rather people starve or get malnutrition?
I'm looking for someone to accept the proposition, take the con of the prop and debate.