@Phillip Wiglesworth - FL exactly, the network between academia, radical leftism and the writers of "reliably sourced" articles has more connections and overlaps than a Pakistani family tree

http://archive.is/Dajx3#selection-1623.1-1623.341

"Onboard the plane, Ersson carried a photograph of the young Afghan whose deportation she and other asylum activists were seeking to prevent. However, after searching the flight she found he was not on board. She decided to continue her protest to prevent the deportation of another Afghan on the flight, who it emerged had a criminal record."

I wish we got an English stream of the migrant caravan

so far all we're getting is Spanish. I want a running 24/7 commentary of this

@Salo Saloson TRS hosts rotating in and out would be amusing.

Get some rare combos like Halberstram and Borzoi. Or Lauritz and Walrus.

really the only parts worth commenting on would be when they tear down the gate
"AND THE CONVOY GETS THROUGH THE GATE"

@Goose UK NPCs are defending gang rapists now as well...
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rpa-3c7vKpQ>

@Matthias oh thank God! I am low on stickers!

Oh my goodness so many IE babies, you’d think we were a fertility cult 👶🏻👶🏻👶🏻

>implying we’re not

🤔

Make no mistake, once they take down the Proud Boys, they'll turn their attention on us. This is why we have standards, rules, and guidelines.

That's why we turn down a number of applicants too.

Something like 10-15% of applications are accepted. We really do a very thorough job of vetting people. The interviewers are awesome at this stuff

I thought 20% were rejected

Best part about being an interviewer is hearing these peoples stories about how IE has inspired them to better themselves

Interview gang gang gang

@NateDahl76 we reject far far far more than are accepted

What’s the main reason for application rejection? Tattoes? Previous affiliations? Not being legit?

@NateDahl76 Not replying to our email

@NateDahl76 NS enthusiasts

Wew, we should probably put a disclaimer about the interview on the application form. But if someone is too scared or too disorganized to reply to an email, they probably shouldn’t be in IE

We really don't tell applicants why they're rejected, nor what will get them rejected.

Yeah, that makes sense. But I had someone asking me yesterday if they’d have to submit a picture of them self. They weren’t sure if they’d have to do an interview or what

Tell them to apply and find out for themselves.

We want to weed out extremists, infiltrators, and anyone who is not well adjusted. I expected a lot more questions when I was interviewed, but it really depends on what vibes the interviewer gets

@NateDahl76 I guarantee it's not because of tattoos... 😎

I told them they’d have to do an interview and there would be more vetting after that. He was most worried about personal opsec, and he said he’d apply by the end of the year. @Phillip Wiglesworth - FL

People are allowed to use aliases as members.

Yeah, I told him that and he was reassured

> tfw Asatru Artist *isn't* my real name. <:sad:366743316475281408>

A different guy I got to apply was rejected after his interview

Could have fooled me @Asatru Artist - MD

🖌 🎨 <:varg:359010745192808449>

https://youtu.be/jDTBsAoCFHs

so brave 😩

I bet that is monetized...

WN goes clickbait <:really:453005408064241674>