Message from @Joe the boomer

Discord ID: 444877997921533952


2018-05-12 13:28:21 UTC  

Goodnight

2018-05-12 13:28:23 UTC  

I cant stay awake

2018-05-12 13:28:29 UTC  

Me also

2018-05-12 13:28:40 UTC  

Also, we need to stop using this slang, it trivializes the issues in my opinion

2018-05-12 13:28:59 UTC  

The meme terms do more harm than good

2018-05-12 13:29:06 UTC  

Oíche mhaith chairde

2018-05-12 13:33:19 UTC  

The Protestant work ethic and it's consequences have been a disaster for the human race.

2018-05-12 13:33:44 UTC  

Yes

2018-05-12 13:39:25 UTC  
2018-05-12 13:39:27 UTC  

Ok so

2018-05-12 13:39:28 UTC  

I'm here

2018-05-12 13:40:08 UTC  

owo whats this

2018-05-12 13:54:57 UTC  

this place is dead

2018-05-12 13:56:12 UTC  

i wonder why

2018-05-12 14:41:12 UTC  

Because the frequent posters were rekt

2018-05-12 14:45:33 UTC  

Don't worry. I'm still here.

2018-05-12 14:46:50 UTC  

Just had a boomer tell me he is redpilled and doesn’t like the “tolerant left”

2018-05-12 14:47:12 UTC  

How long before you think he mentions Ben Shapiro and the intellectual dark web.

2018-05-12 15:04:15 UTC  

what is the intellectual dark web

2018-05-12 15:06:20 UTC  

wait till he brings up chemtrails

2018-05-12 15:20:19 UTC  

Who here knows about the aristotelian proof for god's existence?

2018-05-12 15:22:48 UTC  

Of course.

2018-05-12 15:22:56 UTC  

What about them?

2018-05-12 15:23:07 UTC  

Just wanted to understand it a little better

2018-05-12 15:23:26 UTC  

I'm researching aquinas' arguments because I'm an atheist

2018-05-12 15:23:31 UTC  

and I'm just looking for proof otherwise

2018-05-12 15:23:46 UTC  

What I'm having trouble with here

2018-05-12 15:23:52 UTC  

Same tbh

2018-05-12 15:23:54 UTC  

Even though it is high grade, even for most Thomists, Metaphysics ought to be a must-read for any apologist.

2018-05-12 15:24:24 UTC  

Is understanding why the "god" in a sustaining series of causes isn't also subject to an infinite regress

2018-05-12 15:24:59 UTC  

Like I understand that there's a difference between linear and hierarchical causes

2018-05-12 15:25:32 UTC  

But what gives the "unmoved mover"different qualities here

2018-05-12 15:25:40 UTC  

or why

2018-05-12 15:26:25 UTC  

The Angelic Doctor utilized Aristotelian proofs constantly. I'd really recommend getting into the foundations via Metaphysics. But, to get to your point, the primary issue that Aristotle posits depends also on the nature of substances, you know. Like the nature of the natural world via one that isn't natural and is not bound by natural law, but instead is the promulgator of said law.

2018-05-12 15:27:35 UTC  

So the fact that it exists outside of natural law is the reason it cannot itself be caused?

2018-05-12 15:28:38 UTC  

Well, Aristotle posited that as a first mover, in this case, God, He is outside "natural impulse" and is therefore good.

2018-05-12 15:29:22 UTC  

Unless of course even He is a secondary "mover" and someone was even above Him.

2018-05-12 15:29:33 UTC  

The primary aim to grasp is the necessity of the mover itself.

2018-05-12 15:30:05 UTC  

And just to clear up the jargon there, being outside "natural impulse" means that he is not subject to the law that everything must have a cause?

2018-05-12 15:30:55 UTC  

And i've heard people use the term "good" in theology but I'm not sure what it means in that context