or people be self censoring

They're their own species

we would need a peak-optics black man in this movement, like black dynamite

every other race is much closer genetically

@Deleted User I believe all races have some admix except pure Sub-Saharan Africans.

Is this the identitarian way of saying the n word

*puts calipers away*

this server rn

I mean scientifically debating their humanity probably isn’t an effective topic maybe just say they’re their own group and we’re our own group and we don’t need to be forced into shared living spaces where we will compete and cause conflict

@Kingfish I think that would be saying another member in here is being a real maxine right now

It's important to differentiate what we talk about in private and what we talk about with different people

With 95% of people, talking about non human ancestry in Bantus isn't productive

If you want to have discussions about biology in private, that's a different issue

I wasn't debating the humanity part, just talking about genetic placement. I think they're plenty human, but they ain't us.

No not you

@Deleted User It would come off that way to anyone screenshoting...

I would never consider them inhuman, and I don't think those optics would ever fly unless it was in a group of people that just recently suffered violent from them or something, even then thats kind of extreme

Tbh calling blacks Bantus is just kinda a weird thing to do.

I'm with Giovanni on this...

Huwytes are hybrids of Sasquatches and Nordic ayy lmaos: change my mind.

If you are wanting them to sound non-American/non-European, just call them Africans.

lol, ayylamp

@Balgias typamp... typo

Also, it's important to take a nuanced view on things. Some of you guys go too far with the optics stuff. No, we don't need to present as civnats to everyone we talk to. However, we absolutely should censor ourselves around different people.

I think "non human" or "inhuman" is bad optics tbh

use the term " non western " instead

way better

agreed @Asatru Artist - MD

Or just say different

Ya, I agree. Like I said, talking about "nonhuman ancestry" just isn't productive around the vast majority of the public. @Asatru Artist - MD

Blacks are just as human as anyone else, as humans have very divergent evolution. Every race has some non-human ancestry, including Europeans.

@Balgias That wouldn't be accurate, though. They have 100% non-western ancestry.

I’ll be entirely honest. It’s not even about being good optics and presenting well, it’s about not coming off cringy or spergy

I may not be a yuge fan of blacks, but they are human and using those other terms is super bad optics.

that too

Not coming off cringy is part of optics

guys theres only one race

the gamer race

I will be friends with anyone who is a mutually respectful identitarian. Leave it at that.

@Asatru Artist - MD Honestly, if he has the scientific data to back it up, I don't think we should try to convince him he's wrong. Maybe the scientific papers genuinely do show some percentage of non-human ancestry.

The issue isn't whether he's right, the issue is whether it's productive to talk about. Which, publicly, it isn't.

Time for sleepy huwyte music for sleepy huwytes https://youtu.be/fhG8btO_RKY