Message from @LOLTRON
Discord ID: 463327490706767873
and i will respond more later
If it from borjas dont bother
He is the odd one out
what?
I noticed this is the guy
He gets cited all the time when this comes up
At least from 5 different people
Always the same guy
so?
This one guy suport you
The others seem to differ
so?
An immigration inflow equal to 1% of a city's population is associated with increases in average rents and housing values of about 1%. The results suggest an economic impact that is an order of magnitude bigger than that found in labor markets.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009411900600074X
You can relax the zoning laws
This creates the restrictions on how many houses you can build
why is there zoning laws in the first place?
Mostly for envirometal protection
Also it helps to drive prices up for real estate moguls
There's a lot of economic reasons why residential zones are limited. As zones get bigger, the cost of maintenance and support increases proportionally. Roads, parks, infrastructure, sewage, water etc...
<:think_woke:378717098681171988>
Most metropolitan areas are deep blue
very zoned
very regulated
and as such, the supply is slower to react
I have no knowledge of australian economy
```The bottom line is that running a high immigration program requires massive investment and costs a lot, and these costs are borne to a large extent by the incumbent population.
Therefore, if you want wages to be reduced, traffic congestion to get worse, to pay more for utilities and housing, and to see the environment get degraded, then continue with current mass immigration settings. But if you care about maintaining Australian living standards, then immigration needs to be slashed to sensible and sustainable levels.```
Looks convincing, although its unconventional economist â„¢
If they're fleeing a country that violates their human rights, then the country should be colonized by a civilized country.
The UK could do with a revenue bump... The Anglosphere could do with a boost in numbers...
Yeah of Anglos
@DanielKO colonization without dealing w the colonized people seems to end poorly
I thought dealing with the colonized people was the problem, generally?
Depends on your morals
It’s real easy to deal w them if you have no morals, or at least a different moral system than most Whites do today
True.
It is important to note that looking at wage growth for all workers is not certain too
Given that the recession slowed down wage growth for almost all non-super upper class people
Almost all developed economies, both high immigration and low immigration are having higher productivity and lower wage growth
Dad Rock weeew
A lot of that is heavily correllated to the transition from a manufacturing to an intellectual developing economy.. Which is happening in most Western countries...
I'm just following the logical steps from the left.
If it's inhumane to send the immigrants back to their shitholes, then somebody has to un-shithole the shithole.