fascism for 20 years and then a moanrchy

or smthing

The Netherlands during the early 1900's has the ideal government for most people I would state

Most humans are stupid, but the average is a better bet than betting on one guy to turn out well

I would read into it tbh

No fascist govt is going to give up control after any amount of time... <:really:453005408064241674>

@Tyler0317 people with more cows are better than people with less cows

Inevitably, you will end up with king retard

@Jawa you have a link to read about the netherlands?

@Tyler0317 I'll look for one

@Jacob people actually turn out to be more stupid when they are in a group than alone

First step is mandatory boot camp for all high school graduates(including the job specific training after basic)

the group iq is the lowest iq in the group divided by 2

okay now sure us some proof of that

@Sacramento 100% agreed

@Tyler0317 Cant find one that significantly describes it to the extent I would like to provide

@Jacob i'll dm something to you

@Jacob I don't really have a dog in the fight, but to counter your retard son king, kings have been getting couped and assassinated since kings existed.

and again,
>implying monarchy is rule of one man

>inb4 (((goldstein)))

@Tyler0317 Basically it's a constitutional monarchy with a lot of restrictions on the monarch that allows for both authority and democracy to be achieved.

@Deleted User True, but that takes away the main benefit monarchy can offer, which is the stability o a long time ruler

@YourFundamentalTheorum I there's a rule about archiving all links

@Sacramento woof forgot that one

@Jawa roger

http://archive.is/zMdLn

bam

Monarchy today would be largely the rule of the king's advisers and an even less accountable bureaucracy than we have today

Even a good king can't supervise everything

well it's still better than an international clique supervising everything

(((Kings advisers)))

the biggest problem today is probably lack of accountability

Historically, monarchs have often fallen in debt to (((international financiers))) of their wars, but democracy hardly proved any more immune to subversion so I won't press that point too hard

monarchs are also a much better rallying point than a democracy

people would rather die for a monarch

than a president

who will be gone in 4 years

*8...

i'm talking about kamala harris here

@YourFundamentalTheorum I think people would rather die for "the republic" than "the monarch"

@YourFundamentalTheorum I disagree completely. People would rather die for their nation and their people, not for some random royal family. Perhaps that's different where the monarchy has been in place for centuries, but not here