@Jacob i woudln't

sorry

@TMatthews Depending on the situation it can be

most humans are stupid

@Reinhard Wolff haven’t seen that picture in a while

All forms of government are good for a niche situation

@TMatthews I agree it can't exist in this modernity, but I wouldn't say it was bad for the time.

@ophiuchus I remember, too

Leadership of the best. Is what we ought to strive for.

How we choose to define the criteria for "best", I'm open to ideas.

To install traditionalism I would argue Monarchy or Fascism is the way to go

@Jawa this

or maybe a mix

fascism for 20 years and then a moanrchy

or smthing

The Netherlands during the early 1900's has the ideal government for most people I would state

Most humans are stupid, but the average is a better bet than betting on one guy to turn out well

I would read into it tbh

No fascist govt is going to give up control after any amount of time... <:really:453005408064241674>

@Tyler0317 people with more cows are better than people with less cows

Inevitably, you will end up with king retard

@Jawa you have a link to read about the netherlands?

@Tyler0317 I'll look for one

@Jacob people actually turn out to be more stupid when they are in a group than alone

First step is mandatory boot camp for all high school graduates(including the job specific training after basic)

the group iq is the lowest iq in the group divided by 2

okay now sure us some proof of that

@Sacramento 100% agreed

@Tyler0317 Cant find one that significantly describes it to the extent I would like to provide

@Jacob i'll dm something to you

@Jacob I don't really have a dog in the fight, but to counter your retard son king, kings have been getting couped and assassinated since kings existed.

and again,
>implying monarchy is rule of one man

>inb4 (((goldstein)))

@Tyler0317 Basically it's a constitutional monarchy with a lot of restrictions on the monarch that allows for both authority and democracy to be achieved.

@Deleted User True, but that takes away the main benefit monarchy can offer, which is the stability o a long time ruler

@YourFundamentalTheorum I there's a rule about archiving all links

@Sacramento woof forgot that one

@Jawa roger

http://archive.is/zMdLn

bam

Monarchy today would be largely the rule of the king's advisers and an even less accountable bureaucracy than we have today

Even a good king can't supervise everything