Striker is really good for history and little known facts, but his politics are wacky.

Like when he was idolizing North Korea’s economics

@Galaxidus I would do a great disservice if I tried. I've spent some time trying to understand it but @ tmattews seems to have explained it farely well

I'd point out that "national capitalism" is just a rebranding of state capitalism
@TMatthews

Third Position isnt only economical

>NK
>economy

hey, Norkland has an economy

South Korea has a real economy.

>yfw revolution has become commercialized
I bet you them capitalists could sell snow to eskimos, water to fishes, and rain to clouds

What are your guys thoughts on the whole Venezuela situation that Jochim and Striker broke ties over?

@Galaxidus I wasnt aware that happened, do you have a link?

dont know it, but Venezuela is a mess.

Is there a vid of them breaking up I think heel turn deleted theirs

@Galaxidus I would contest that because we had capitalism for centuries while also being nationalistic. Modern cultural degeneracy is facilitated by capitalism, but its root is in the media, not economics

@Krypto- OH It got deleted, Ill try and get you the bitchute link

Much appreciated. I remember their argument over Japan but that was kind of squashed.

@Krypto- OH https://www.bitchute.com/video/rcuMdN37jFbx/

There's nothing wrong with Capitalism imo. Commies like to confuse Capitalism for Corperatism, which would be much more accurate when describing (((big companies)))

I will use that from now on, Anglo.

Thank you.

@TMatthews Capitalism is a tool, the people currently using it are using it for evil intent.

@Galaxidus it doesnt seem to want to play.

I'll call people who are against capitalism anti-semitic, which will then lead them down the path of learning that 99.9999 percent of corporations are owned by Jews.

@Krypto- OH Let it load, it takes a few mins for the play button to show up

Okay, thank you

@Selma That's fair 😄

@Krypto- OH Let me know your thoughts on the subject they end up debating, curious of what others think

@The Eternal Anglo does Corporatism naturally come after Capitalism?

@The Eternal Anglo That's my thought process also. National capitalism as I call it allows free markets but intervenes to protect the national interest. Teddy Roosevelt is an example of this

@Deleted User If the government is for sale then in a capitalist state the people with the most capital will buy up the most influence and evetually usher in corporatism

@Galaxidus That’s my thinking.

Thats why you need a strong state

@TMatthews I agree, I feel like National Capitalism is just a more optic friendly term for NatSoc to be honest.
@Deleted User I think that if companies are allowed to uproot themselves outside the interests of their host nation's people's interests, it can become corperatism-like.

fascism is the merger of state and corporate power

Yeah. It’s a tough call.

capitalism is far from what we know it as today

There is no perfect system.

capitalism is also the methodology to bring true communism as a final order

@The Eternal Anglo Right, the corporation need to serve the needs of the state and the people it represents.

@Galaxidus will do brother

I think it's when a Company becomes so large or unrestrained that they are basically an autonomous government within their own country, or a small country themselves. @Deleted User