@Sherlock Not really.

@Sherlock All that you have to do is say "woohoo without consequences and you get $$$ for it!". The bad decision making skills and low time preference that low-IQ people have takes care of the rest.

It would be much easier to convince better off people to have more chikdren than the reverse

@Sherlock I disagree. Teaching the wealthy to have children is much more difficult.

There is an organization that pays people with crack addictions to get sterilized.

@Rabbidsith If you have institutional power, sure I agree. When you're part of a dissident movement, you have to be more careful. Because if you are not then you're giving the opposition ammunition against you.

@Rabbidsith people with low iq and low impulse control arent going to be rational enough to avoid sex for a little money. What they almost certainly will do is say “yeah sure thing gimme money” and then have ten kids

@Virgil If you are a part of a dissident movement, then you won't have the power necessary to censor.

@Sherlock this

@Sherlock That's why you give them the money *after* they agree to the procedure and have it done.

@Nerv - VA Anglin is a dreamer. Bringing science fiction into the realm of what could be politically possible is a good thing in general but I don't think he understands all the ways in which children need their mother. Maybe someday a robot could do all that but that day is far off.

@Virgil No one should be censored especially on a platform where ideas are supposed to compete. Advocating for censorship of people you deem "wignats" who are really not that far from you on the political spectrum is dumb as hell. Your point sucks and you deserve to be abuse by Twitter.

@Sherlock c'mon use that brain

@Rabbidsith Not society, but within the movement itself you do

@Rabbidsith those are exactly the sort of policies im advocating for lol

@Virgil Ah. Within a movement thought policing is always going to happen. However, it has to be done in moderation.

@Sherlock Fair enough. However, that's not forceful. Again, there's no need to force someone.

@ExternalPepsi Again other than vulgar name calling, do you have an actual well thought out argument?

I have to actually get a little work done here, let's remember to engage respectfully with one another, please.

I never said anything about forcing people, you did

@Virgil Do you?!

Um. What tf is this? Its like the YouTube message that RT is partially funded by Russia. But a wiki article on Jews.

@Virgil Muh wignats

CENSOR DEM

@Rabbidsith I agree 100%

@Sherlock In that case, I apologize for strawmanning you.

@Virgil That's good to hear.

@ExternalPepsi @Virgil Ian is talking to you guys. Mods will slap the cuffs on hotheads real fast. Once they wake up

@ExternalPepsi I already made my arguments in multiple previous posts.

Mods are asleep. Post heresy. ;)

jk

@Virgil Yeah genius what do you think I was responding to?

@Rabbidsith

@Voodoo HAHAHA! That's a good one.

@Papa Pizzagate some people will be convinced. I was

@ExternalPepsi what's the deal man

Most people probably only think it’s bad because they were told to think it’s bad

@Virgil I saw your arguments, said why I disagreed with them.

@ExternalPepsi 1. Being rude to other members is not acceptable

Once they start realizing how much worse the country would be if all the aborted babies were around, they might start thinking twice