Sterilization is also great

@Rabbidsith Do I get $1k for every IQ point above average? <:galaxybrain:366743669484683264>

@Sherlock Well, that's on you chief. Not gonna moralize here, but I think you'll find a great majority of white americans find themselves decidedly in the "killing babies is bad" camp.

Embracing it is a losing position.

@Asatru Artist - MD No. 2k in Scholarships.

>tfw scholarships to paint pretty pictures

@Asatru Artist - MD Art is important.

If you have higher quality people having kids at a rate at all higher than average that's eugenics. You don't need ghoulish forceful policies that most people will find repugnant and want to overthrow

Well stated

@Ald Indeed. You just need incentives.

issue is all our policies now stifle high IQ reproduction and massively accelerate low IQ reproduction <:sad:366743316475281408>

@Papa Pizzagate they should be educated about it’s social benefit

because the high IQ are paying for the low IQ babies...

White Americans in the midwest have embraced down-syndrome babies as a way of undermining abortion. Tolerance for ideas like sterilization and abortion is bretty low among Whites.

We don't have to become stereotypical nazis in order to affect better genetic health.

@Ald how are you gonna achieve that without some eugenic policies tho

Natural selection is harsh, and we have artificially short circuited it

@Sherlock We don't need things to be forceful.

@ExternalPepsi No, I've made my point in previous posts. Do you have an actual argument as to why wignats shouldn't be censored? I'm sure you've seen the damage people like that do to a platform

@Sherlock It's completely unneccessary. All that we have to do is instill low IQ populations with a pervasive anti-natalism.

Did anyone read AAs’ idea about artificially insiminating Asians? Once I got past thinking about how sad it was just in a personal level for him to be thinking about that, it actually seems like a good Idea, if someone had a lot of money.

@Sherlock Humans are not logical creatures. Showing someone a chart of social benefit won't convince them if they feel like a (frankly barbaric) practice is wrong.

The data might be there, but feelings don't care about your facts.

Pathos reigns supreme.

@Rabbidsith that sounds a heck of a lot easier said than done

@Virgil Simple. Freedom of speech is ultimately necessary. A stable society can't exist without it.

@Sherlock Not really.

@Sherlock All that you have to do is say "woohoo without consequences and you get $$$ for it!". The bad decision making skills and low time preference that low-IQ people have takes care of the rest.

It would be much easier to convince better off people to have more chikdren than the reverse

@Sherlock I disagree. Teaching the wealthy to have children is much more difficult.

There is an organization that pays people with crack addictions to get sterilized.

@Rabbidsith If you have institutional power, sure I agree. When you're part of a dissident movement, you have to be more careful. Because if you are not then you're giving the opposition ammunition against you.

@Rabbidsith people with low iq and low impulse control arent going to be rational enough to avoid sex for a little money. What they almost certainly will do is say “yeah sure thing gimme money” and then have ten kids

@Virgil If you are a part of a dissident movement, then you won't have the power necessary to censor.

@Sherlock this

@Sherlock That's why you give them the money *after* they agree to the procedure and have it done.

@Nerv - VA Anglin is a dreamer. Bringing science fiction into the realm of what could be politically possible is a good thing in general but I don't think he understands all the ways in which children need their mother. Maybe someday a robot could do all that but that day is far off.

@Virgil No one should be censored especially on a platform where ideas are supposed to compete. Advocating for censorship of people you deem "wignats" who are really not that far from you on the political spectrum is dumb as hell. Your point sucks and you deserve to be abuse by Twitter.

@Sherlock c'mon use that brain

@Rabbidsith Not society, but within the movement itself you do

@Rabbidsith those are exactly the sort of policies im advocating for lol

@Virgil Ah. Within a movement thought policing is always going to happen. However, it has to be done in moderation.

@Sherlock Fair enough. However, that's not forceful. Again, there's no need to force someone.

@ExternalPepsi Again other than vulgar name calling, do you have an actual well thought out argument?