Message from @Hickory

Discord ID: 448949467874459668


2018-05-23 20:41:48 UTC  

the dick wouldnt work

2018-05-23 20:41:50 UTC  

I’m said that’s when it would be equal

2018-05-23 20:42:05 UTC  

no you said it would not be worse

2018-05-23 20:42:10 UTC  

Yeah women

2018-05-23 20:42:21 UTC  

As in fgm wouldn’t be worse if that were the case

2018-05-23 20:42:26 UTC  

we need a #dickdebate channel

2018-05-23 20:42:32 UTC  

lmao

2018-05-23 20:42:33 UTC  

@shinjitsu
Female circumcision is also defined DOWN to nicking or cutting the clitoral hood, the LITERAL analogue of male circumcision.

2018-05-23 20:42:53 UTC  

Do people really find female soldiers as a badass thing. Am i the only one thinking its a joke to see

2018-05-23 20:42:53 UTC  

Yeah but people aren’t talking about nicking the clitoral hood

2018-05-23 20:43:02 UTC  
2018-05-23 20:43:02 UTC  

If that’s all you’re talking about then sure you’re right it’s not worse

2018-05-23 20:43:24 UTC  

If you’re talking entire removal of the clitoris then that’s worse than snip snip on foreskin

2018-05-23 20:43:33 UTC  

#changemymind

2018-05-23 20:43:56 UTC  

Btw I am anti circumcision

2018-05-23 20:43:58 UTC  

@shinjitsu
That is the MAJORITY them! Infibulation is only a tiny fraction! And clitoredecromy removes only TINY distal bit of the clitoris.

2018-05-23 20:44:27 UTC  

Okay fine then I didn’t know that but when people hear it, that’s not what they think is meant by fgm

2018-05-23 20:44:32 UTC  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suLJJplFSQU listen to this, patrick little is much more intelligent and viable than Nehlen

2018-05-23 20:44:34 UTC  

fellas do we really expect muzzies to do it scientifically

2018-05-23 20:44:51 UTC  

People who knee-jerk say "FGM is worse" are operating on feminist horror propaganda.

2018-05-23 20:44:54 UTC  

he quotes lots of facts and stats and historical events

2018-05-23 20:45:10 UTC  

Wrong. Most people understand fgm to be a literal removal of the clitoris

2018-05-23 20:45:39 UTC  

Which I guess you could say in a roundabout way may be feminist horror propaganda but it’s a bit of a stretch

2018-05-23 20:45:48 UTC  

More like Israeli anti Muslim propaganda

2018-05-23 20:47:13 UTC  

time to start putting people to death for circumcision

2018-05-23 20:47:18 UTC  

An uncircumcised man tends to have more confidence than his circumcised counterpart, controlling for all other factors of course

2018-05-23 20:47:32 UTC  

Where is that research

2018-05-23 20:47:56 UTC  

the virgin doubter

2018-05-23 20:48:19 UTC  

He says “controlling for other factors” as if there is research on this, so I’m simply saying show me the research

2018-05-23 20:48:27 UTC  

It is true that intact men are happier with their status than any other group. Men circumcised in infancy had the least satisfaction.

2018-05-23 20:48:28 UTC  

Uncircumcised men tend to be longer and wider as well

2018-05-23 20:48:45 UTC  

Any research noble?

2018-05-23 20:48:51 UTC  

Indeed

2018-05-23 20:48:58 UTC  

I have at least seen Greg back what he says up

2018-05-23 20:48:59 UTC  

Plenty of peer reviewed research h

2018-05-23 20:49:05 UTC  

Link one paper

2018-05-23 20:49:14 UTC  

circumsicse this

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/441068168845197334/448950556481028106/firing_squad.gif

2018-05-23 20:49:34 UTC  

@NobleManWithABigHeart
A 1995 Australian condom sizing study found that circumcision in infancy reduces both true girth (intuitively) and (rather surprisingly) length of the adult penis.

2018-05-23 20:50:13 UTC  

The Bossio study inadvertently admitted that intact men are the happiest cohort.

2018-05-23 20:50:23 UTC  

WTF

2018-05-23 20:50:34 UTC  

Where is this Australia study I can’t find t