Message from @Hector
Discord ID: 509792975153266695
Anyone post Trumps exchange with Jim Acosta yet?
Haven’t seen him this angry in a while
@fire.within - FL watching it live. I guess I missed that though
“that’s such a racist question”
o o f
hahaha exactly!
“impeecheeng”
Pelosi has already said that’s not gonna happen
god her voice is annoying
Possible pilpul
Does Putin ever have to deal with childish people like Jim Acosta?
@Singleton Mosby WV not for long
“I retired Jeff Flake”
Certainly not @Singleton Mosby WV
is that like retiring replicants in BR?
"more entertaining question please"
did he say MTV Lebanon?
sounds lit
and the JQ, to an extent
Trump unloading on Acosta was so satisfying
Nixon was based in every definition of the word
Too bad he supported government overreach
Yes. it is important to remember the Ohio River *CAUGHT FIRE* EPA was necessary, and is
Trump said white supremacist terror is a problem he’s going to deal with, and he “doesn’t even like it a little bit”.
After some reporter just asked him about it.
Yeah, of course not. Just thought it was an interesting statement.
A reporter was chastising him for focusing on Islamic terrorism instead of “right wing terrorism”
Watching the video of King Trump going off on Jim Acosta right now. Something about the reporter who goes next... he looks familiar. 🤔
Well Trump is all talk. Maybe he's all talk about both the bad as well as the good
Seems the white women voted for the non white candidate lol
so did the white men!
they're both white
DR3 LOL
@Nemets THAT is a big reason for my blackpilling. If re house had held more, Trump could purge FBI to an extent
Then again he could have any time last two years
I low key like Ivy League affirmative action. Glow in the darks and globalists sourcing from upjumped scholarship browns lowers their effectiveness. Better than them incorporating the Yellow Peril
Trump just kicked some serious ass in that last press conference ten minutes ago.
While chronic pessimism is unproductive, it's also unproductive to dismiss genuine concerns. There's a huge difference between being a defeatist and acknowledging legitimate obstacles that we have. When someone mentions that historically Republican states were won by small margins, the correct response isn't to dismiss this person and point out the obvious, that we won it this time at least, the correct response is to talk about what we can do to solve the problem. Yes, we've seen a lot of positive developments recently. That doesn't mean we can't discuss negative developments. When someone brings up a negative development, the correct response isn't to yell at them about how cool it is that birthright citizenship is going away. You can acknowledge setbacks. We're all adults here and we can handle it.
The truth is, it *does* suck that we lost the house. However, there's no need to create a false dichotomy on how to respond. It's not a choice between ignoring it and overdosing on whitepills or becoming a defeatist. You can acknowledge the problem and discuss it.
Plus with SJW nonsense the Ivy League is increasingly a meme and liability for anyone who isn't deep state