Every edit takes a Supreme Court case to change now.

Well I think for a while someone I won’t name was running around saying stuff like that with Richard Spencer.

I've never heard of anyone named Eli in my entire life.

A lot of what we think are economic problems can be attributed largely to immigration and cultural issues. For example, healthcare costs have been driven up by the obesity epidemic. Wages have been driven down by women and immigrants flooding the workforce. At the same time, immigration has driven costs of living (especially housing) up. Addressing things metapolitically like we do is the wise approach for now. Other than immigration, most policy debates are apt to divide us unnecessarily

That's a good point

I bet you guys haven't even gotten the Dragon eye tattoed on your foreheaeds, smh

We do need to discuss these issues to some extent, even if just in the context of winning elections

@Ben Rainsford - OH haha that would be against the rules (no uncoverable tattoos)

And, honestly, people who let themselves get divided by these issues are just weak. So, someone has different economic views from you. Who cares? As long as you're trying to guarantee a homeland for our people and have good optics, you're on the same side.

i think economics plays a HUGE role in finding the way forward

I think national capitalism (private industry regulated for the good of the the country as a whole) is the way to go. That's what Trump ran on in the Rust Belt quite successfully. Unfortunately, he then passed Paul Ryan's agenda, not his own

specifically because J-bankers use the economics layer to subvert everything under the sun

the Fed needs to End

It’s proven that the greatest economic position you can take is removing the Jews from your country.

IE shouldn't be an echo chamber. We can't just avoid discussing anything that two people might disagree about. It's one thing to ban religious discussion, but we can't just keep avoiding every topic until the only thing we're allowed to discuss is our shared distate for diverse communities.

Just keep in mind that attacks on capitalism come across very badly to most of white America and increase your likelihood of being called nazi, fascist, etc. Criticizing "corporatism" goes over fine though

at the very core, you should at least own some physical gold & maybe crypto

You shouldn't criticize "corporatism" as a stand in for "capitalism", because it's an entirely different system and anyone who is educated is gonna give you a weird look @TMatthews

But, besides that, you're absolutely correct, and these are exactly the discussions we need to have

if the USD blows up, it's going to have to find its way back to gold and other hard assets - which is very likely. we should be prepared for this outcome

if the USD blows up we're screwed

economically

I would never go around talking about how we need to smash capitalism, but, at the same time, I would advocate for adopting some left wing policies

all of those white-collar laborers are screwed

not if Trump is refilling Ft Knox as we speak, but that's a big IF

@Jacob I disagree. If you make the distinction that capitalism is private ownership of the means of production, but not corporations running rampant, you can hit an ideal middle ground

BRICS can reset gold price if they want, but the main reason they would do that is doubting size of US holdings

"Corporatism" basically just means that we have oligopolies rather than perfect competition. Regulation is necessary to compensate for that

For the record, socialists didn't bring nationalised healthcare to European countries, it was Christian Democracy parties.

that's my hope, that once BRICS pulls the trigger, we will see Trump stock greenbacks and oust the Fed - and who loves gold more than Trump?

Blacks

yo

ayo

hol up

so you be sayin

Hahaha

I mean, you can't really disagree because it's not an opinion. "Corporatism" refers to a specific economic system that has nothing to do with corporations running rampant. Scandinavian countries, for example, use a form of corporatism. The US does not practice corporatism. It's not just a slur, it's a specific economic system, and anyone who is educated in history is going to give you a weird look if you use "corporatism" in that context, because that's literally not what it means. @TMatthews

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporatism

@Jacob I can because that's not what the ordinary person thinks of when they hear it. Fascism is a specific ideology too, but it basically just means "anything authoritarian that I dislike" in modern American political language

monopolies are ok if they're not inflexible commodities like energy & food, because they will drive competition