A degree in phsyics and biophysics does not equal a degree in computer science....

Electronic engineers brought us computers, physicists brought us the basic building blocks for electronic engineers to work with...

still != a degree in computer science....

Okay... I'll give you the fantasy or a machine rebellion by superhuman intelligence... but there's a catch, there's a "heart" within the machine, the super AI can't run without this heart and if there's an attempt to modify this heart, the machine gets shut down and destroyed.. if a machine initiates a violent action, it's "heart" gets activated, and the machine gets destroyed.... there's really no question about this subject...

You can't just deactivate a terrorist in that fashion, no matter how organised...

i feel like youre arguing against a fantasy point that isnt even being made...

"uneducated" bro, the dude does conferences with programmers and other academic fields all the time

And I hope he doesn't lecture programmers about software

not only that, but the very point youre trying to make with is the limitations of the original inputs is made in a similar fashion but better explained by him in that very video if i remember correctly

i was afk for quite a bit

if you understood classic computing, you'd see why that isn't an issue

``` you'd see why that isn't an issue```

what?

what do you think is being said exactly?

it seems you have the tendency of assuming what's being said rather than hearing out the person's actual point.

About to be me in a hot minute

There's no point to be made, he's basically claiming that a computers going to draw a conclusion that being violent is gonna solve all it's problems, or it's going to be sentient and want to live just like a human, so it's gonna kill everyone....

```There's no point to be made, he's basically claiming that a computers going to draw a conclusion that being violent is gonna solve all it's problems, or it's going to be sentient and want to live just like a human, so it's gonna kill everyone....```

he literally argues the exact opposite

this is what i mean, it seems you have the tendency of assuming what's being said rather than hearing out the person's actual point.

bashing your chess opponent over the head with the clock to secure victory?

you got the literal opposite of what he said

did you listen past that?

where he implies the reasons as to why that isnt done...

Not far past it no, I was already going ape shit

15 minutes too long

no offense but youre a bit too full of yourself

The skynet reference at the start really got to me... that's all we fucking hear as programmers...

bro, i know programmers, they arent exactly an esoteric segment of society

its a fairly popular academic field

or sociable, I know lol

and no, they dont just hear that all the time

I'm trying to put across the technical implications of the situation, not the hypothetical ones..

i feel as if you have much to gain by actually listening to what's being said rather than just assuming the meaning or intention of what's being said

I'm not watching anything else of this guys creation... lol

well, you havent gotten far and already completely got the conclusion of the video wrong based off of your own assumptions

either way, my comments arent just referring to the videos but how you act in general it seems

because youve acted in a similar fashion during the discussion concerning 5g

I'm logical, not emotional