Lucky for us, computers and machines are overly honest... and can't lie... unless told to lie of course.. lol

This is a good video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHd22kMa0_w

Just saying....

More than one way to skin the hypothetical cat when it comes to that...

I'll watch the video.... but I feel like I'm watching some cowboy movie...

I hate the way this guy talks.. I'm already having aneurysms with a couple points this guys tried to make

"er" != "oh"

TERMINATOR REFERENCE

DEFENCE COMPUTOH

I'm getting brain damage

Alright, lets just start now with a rather inhumane sounding situation, if I had a child, and stuck it in a room, and made it learn about all the sciences, but restricted it's access to information such as violence and weaponary, you'd never know they existed or how to operate a violent action.... this is a different level of stupid

Which is all very possible to do with a machine learning system

THE FERMI PARADOX, THE ALIENS ARE NOT HERE NOR DO THEY WANT TO BE HERE BECAUSE THEY RUN THE RISK OF BEING A BLOCK OF SWISS CHEESE OR A GOURMET DISH

I really don't know how to explain this to you guys that these videos are nothing but uneducated paranoia

A degree in phsyics and biophysics does not equal a degree in computer science....

Electronic engineers brought us computers, physicists brought us the basic building blocks for electronic engineers to work with...

still != a degree in computer science....

Okay... I'll give you the fantasy or a machine rebellion by superhuman intelligence... but there's a catch, there's a "heart" within the machine, the super AI can't run without this heart and if there's an attempt to modify this heart, the machine gets shut down and destroyed.. if a machine initiates a violent action, it's "heart" gets activated, and the machine gets destroyed.... there's really no question about this subject...

You can't just deactivate a terrorist in that fashion, no matter how organised...

i feel like youre arguing against a fantasy point that isnt even being made...

"uneducated" bro, the dude does conferences with programmers and other academic fields all the time

And I hope he doesn't lecture programmers about software

not only that, but the very point youre trying to make with is the limitations of the original inputs is made in a similar fashion but better explained by him in that very video if i remember correctly

i was afk for quite a bit

if you understood classic computing, you'd see why that isn't an issue

``` you'd see why that isn't an issue```

what?

what do you think is being said exactly?

it seems you have the tendency of assuming what's being said rather than hearing out the person's actual point.

About to be me in a hot minute

There's no point to be made, he's basically claiming that a computers going to draw a conclusion that being violent is gonna solve all it's problems, or it's going to be sentient and want to live just like a human, so it's gonna kill everyone....

```There's no point to be made, he's basically claiming that a computers going to draw a conclusion that being violent is gonna solve all it's problems, or it's going to be sentient and want to live just like a human, so it's gonna kill everyone....```

he literally argues the exact opposite

this is what i mean, it seems you have the tendency of assuming what's being said rather than hearing out the person's actual point.

bashing your chess opponent over the head with the clock to secure victory?

you got the literal opposite of what he said

did you listen past that?