Message from @Joe Snow
Discord ID: 799365102213922826
Most of the cases were dismissed on procedure not on merrit
Supreme court wouldnt even hear it
Congress wouldnt hear it
I'm saying because there is no evidence of fraud doesn't mean it hasn't happened, but I'm anything but suggesting there was wide-spread fraud. I follow Hanlon's Razor and Occam's Razor as principles.
The media wouldnt dare entertain it
This isn't really true.
It is absolutely true
Many, many cases were looked at the merits.
The texas case was dismissed on standing
The texas case wasn't even about fraud really.
Many were not even heard
Well... we have to disagree there. There have been over 60 cases. I have watched hours of hearings and read dozens of affidavits and I personally do not see even a reasonable suspicion.
And, I would truly like to see the link of the guy hacking into the system in the GA hearing. I truly didn't hear about that at all .
Trump and his team did not file 60 suits
You're literally just cycling talking points right now.
Rather than discussing.
Other ppl have filed suits that have failed, thats correct. But they were not his cases that were ridiculous.
@Joe Snow, you just advanced to level 9!
He just claimed '"I'm in" *in hacker voice*' with literally 0 evidence.
Yes. That is true. Many were not heard on the merits, but some were and those were dismissed as well.
And the fact a case was not heard on the merits it just part of the legal system. If a plaintiff doesn't have standing then he/she doesnt have standing and the case must be dismissed. And that decision can be appealed.
Which also meant he claimed he committed a crime on live TV.
No. That is not accurate. Team Trump had cases heard on the merits in GA and in Michigan and in Pennsylvania
It was mind-blowing.
More votes than registered should be a pretty decent indicator
Getting more ballots back than you mail out ought to send up some red flags
Shredding ballots in GA is ultra suspect
And in Wisconsin, if not mistaken Team Trump had a case dismissed on the merits
So, a case? Or 60?
Where is the evidence of that again? They shredded secrecy envelopes I believe. Otherwise it'd be illegal, and they'd not be able to perform recounts.
Literally 0.
They fought audits at every turn
I just dont understand why that would even be a thing
They counted in private after they faked a water pipe bursting
There were over 60 cases in total... I have no clue how many were heard on the merits but there were several. I personally read at least 3.
https://youtu.be/tPmw0PnrvBM?t=25 This is what he's talking about.
They told the observers to go home and ran the same pile thru tabulators 18 times in a row
I mean i could go on and on and on and on with all of the stupidly obviously sketchy shit that went on, but it doesnt sound like you guys believe that couldve happened despite the existence of video
Good thing this shows up in recounts.