Message from @metasophocles
Discord ID: 514593978927284264
That doesn't mean that lawlessness is better. "Why even try?"
I haven’t called for that.
we should do isidewith
it'll be fun
I’d enjoy that.
This debate is about unfettered Capitalism
Capitalism does indeed still have laws.
Akin to lawlessness
No.
Unfettered
Lawless
You cannot have Capitalism without legal protections on property rights.
And protection from force and fraud.
There are legal preconditions. Without those, we aren’t discussing capitalism.
I'm talking about putting restrictions on the system itself, not the restrictions inherent in the system
Perhaps we should have agreed to a definition before starting 😉
I'm taking isidewith right now
someone redpill me on fracking
not sure how to answer that question
oh okay
Fracking is cool, it was invented by the soviets.
thanks
You can actually drink the stuff
They had to meet quotas so they found new ways to extract petroleum.
The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels is the best book on the topic of various fuels I’ve read.
Alot of the fracking in colorado is done on old coal seams where oil production wasnt being done
@Alexander Pechorin published by the Koch Brothers?
By Alex Epstein. Admittedly Jew but a good book.
Saudis hate frackers.
Locavores Dilemna is a related book by Pierre Desrochers
Should the U.S. expand offshore oil drilling?
Yes.
Yes.
Energy independence until glorious nuclear energy is the way lads
We clean our messes pretty fast.
"permanently poison your drinking water and create new earthquake zones to own the Muslims!"
<:really:453005408064241674> <:really:453005408064241674>
I honestly don't know. If th alternative is to buy more from Saudi Arabia, then yes, but if the alternative is nuclear or something else based and redpilled then no.
There are always tradeoffs.
I'm personally for wood gasification. Will have a wood gasified engine on my next truck.