Im sorry, i missed any of the evidence in that monologue

Evidence of what?

You posted a video.

I addressed the video.

You gave me a personal attack, then linked to a debunked book.

Now you ask me for evidence of some kind.

I posted a friends debate stream because i was being nice

Perhaps you need to learn how to communicate.

A friend?

I suppose it doesn't matter which one was your friend.

But I was under the impression that you wanted folks to see the content of said stream, then comment and discuss it.

Was I mistaken?

Ahh yes that video. It presented evidence. Did you watch it?

https://youtu.be/BwCMj5Yiqtg

Given the fact that I commented on the first 25 minutes of the video, then transcribed at least several additional minutes of the video, that would indeed be evidence that I watched at least 30+ minutes of the video.

Did you miss the part where I typed words here?

or did you simply launch into your personal attack without even reading what I had written?

Your tone is so disgruntled i probably missed it.

My apologies. Nearly all of my above posts from just a few minutes ago only apply to the video between Sean G and Travis.

Regarding the video you originally posted and just reposted a few minutes ago, I have only skipped through it , watching approximately 2-3 minutes of it so far.

I have still only been able to view a few minutes of this above video between minutes 1 through 6.

So far, pointing out that a test might have been flawed would only prove that a test might have been flawed.

Regarding the power line masts going across Lake Pontchartrain:
(the pic below is an animated gif.)

👆 CGI rendering of the power line masts that follow the curvature of the earth, over the top of a picture taken.

Looks like a damn near perfect example of proof of earth's curvature.

Here is a pretty good earth curvature calculator, in case you didn't see it already:

https://physicsstuff.000webhostapp.com/

(enable Java and click ENGLISH, unless you also write Cyrillic)

I have no idea what that helicopter disappearing below the horizon business is all about, and I'm not going to dissect it. I don't consider much of anything coming from the Discovery Channel to not include some percentage of bullshit, either accidentally or intentionally.

Next, how difficult can it be to find 24 hour time-lapse footage of the sun never going down in Antarctica?

False premise comes to mind.

Instead of using broken time-lapse footage of Antarctica, claiming that because the footage is broken, that means the sun must go down, why not just find unbroken footage?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKhvQbHX4jk

That took me less than 30 seconds to find that video, and less than 4 minutes to witness at least two full 24 hour, unbroken turns of the sun. The sun doesn't go down in Antarctica, during parts of the year.

On the other side of the globe, in Alaska's northernmost village, Barrow, far above the Arctic Circle, the sun doesn't set for 84 days.

Also notice that the shadows in the Antarctica Midnight Sun 24-Hour Time Lapse video are all very long or very, very long.

Lastly, using a Netflix movie from 2013 as proof that the sun doesn't go down, based solely on their choice of when to splice the loop is a problem.

**SEVEN YEARS** it took you to find that bad splice video and now claim it as bullet-proof evidence of something other than a clip from a movie.

Then an additional time lapse video from 2015 was used that had text overlays for North, West, South, and East. The starburst effect was perhaps dressed up, but the watch was clearly not fake. Besides the text and starburst overlay, you can't prove a damn thing was fake in that video.

Why didn't you also include the part at the end of this 2015 original video that shows the secondary time lapse camera capturing time lapse pictures of the primary time lapse camera following the sun automatically and snapping photos to create the original video with? Quite telling that it's left out, isn't it? The wrist watch is clearly visible spinning around in front of the primary camera, even though the deceptive narrator **CLEARLY** says that _"the wrist watch is a computer graphic"_.

How about this: Since I'm 100% certain that the creator of the Globebusters YouTube video you posted **KNEW** about the evidence that he conveniently left out at the end of that 2015 video, he has completely discredited himself, and thusly, the entire video. In for a penny, in for a pound, eh? Don't lie honest people and they won't know you as a liar.

👇 Below is the 2015 video that your boy conveniently left out the footage of the secondary camera filming the primary one, with the wrist watch in clear view.