Message from @Karnivore
Discord ID: 704818651752169582
I suppose it doesn't matter which one was your friend.
But I was under the impression that you wanted folks to see the content of said stream, then comment and discuss it.
Was I mistaken?
Ahh yes that video. It presented evidence. Did you watch it?
Given the fact that I commented on the first 25 minutes of the video, then transcribed at least several additional minutes of the video, that would indeed be evidence that I watched at least 30+ minutes of the video.
Did you miss the part where I typed words here?
or did you simply launch into your personal attack without even reading what I had written?
Your tone is so disgruntled i probably missed it.
My apologies. Nearly all of my above posts from just a few minutes ago only apply to the video between Sean G and Travis.
Regarding the video you originally posted and just reposted a few minutes ago, I have only skipped through it , watching approximately 2-3 minutes of it so far.
I have still only been able to view a few minutes of this above video between minutes 1 through 6.
So far, pointing out that a test might have been flawed would only prove that a test might have been flawed.
Regarding the power line masts going across Lake Pontchartrain:
(the pic below is an animated gif.)
👆 CGI rendering of the power line masts that follow the curvature of the earth, over the top of a picture taken.
Looks like a damn near perfect example of proof of earth's curvature.
Here is a pretty good earth curvature calculator, in case you didn't see it already:
(enable Java and click ENGLISH, unless you also write Cyrillic)
I have no idea what that helicopter disappearing below the horizon business is all about, and I'm not going to dissect it. I don't consider much of anything coming from the Discovery Channel to not include some percentage of bullshit, either accidentally or intentionally.
Next, how difficult can it be to find 24 hour time-lapse footage of the sun never going down in Antarctica?
False premise comes to mind.
Instead of using broken time-lapse footage of Antarctica, claiming that because the footage is broken, that means the sun must go down, why not just find unbroken footage?
That took me less than 30 seconds to find that video, and less than 4 minutes to witness at least two full 24 hour, unbroken turns of the sun. The sun doesn't go down in Antarctica, during parts of the year.
On the other side of the globe, in Alaska's northernmost village, Barrow, far above the Arctic Circle, the sun doesn't set for 84 days.
Also notice that the shadows in the Antarctica Midnight Sun 24-Hour Time Lapse video are all very long or very, very long.
Lastly, using a Netflix movie from 2013 as proof that the sun doesn't go down, based solely on their choice of when to splice the loop is a problem.
**SEVEN YEARS** it took you to find that bad splice video and now claim it as bullet-proof evidence of something other than a clip from a movie.
Then an additional time lapse video from 2015 was used that had text overlays for North, West, South, and East. The starburst effect was perhaps dressed up, but the watch was clearly not fake. Besides the text and starburst overlay, you can't prove a damn thing was fake in that video.
Why didn't you also include the part at the end of this 2015 original video that shows the secondary time lapse camera capturing time lapse pictures of the primary time lapse camera following the sun automatically and snapping photos to create the original video with? Quite telling that it's left out, isn't it? The wrist watch is clearly visible spinning around in front of the primary camera, even though the deceptive narrator **CLEARLY** says that _"the wrist watch is a computer graphic"_.
How about this: Since I'm 100% certain that the creator of the Globebusters YouTube video you posted **KNEW** about the evidence that he conveniently left out at the end of that 2015 video, he has completely discredited himself, and thusly, the entire video. In for a penny, in for a pound, eh? Don't lie honest people and they won't know you as a liar.
👇 Below is the 2015 video that your boy conveniently left out the footage of the secondary camera filming the primary one, with the wrist watch in clear view.
>
> In the summer time at Scott Base the sun is above the horizon for 4 months, from roughly the end of the third week of October until the end of the third week of February. This shows the movement of the sun over a full 24 hour period near the peak of summer.
> https://www.AntarcticImages.com/
>
> Camera was set to take a photo once every one minute and one second (so that the second hand would be moving) should have made it 1min and 2 secs so the send hand would move faster than the minute hand in retrospect. ISO 100, 100th sec exposure. Lens was set on f22 to get enough depth of field to have the watch and horizon both in focus, hence the sun-ray effect. A modified Orion equatorial telescope mount was used to track the sun. Camera and tracking powered by solar panel and batteries.
> To see what the sun does at the actual South Pole, check out this video by Robert Schwarz: https://vimeo.com/208466944
>
> P.S. Flat Earth people, you are very entertaining with your comments. My challenge to you: put your money where your mouth is and book a cruise ship holiday to Antarctica below the Antarctic circle to prove the video wrong. I'll even reimburse the cost of your trip if you can prove the sun does not do this as shown in this video... Edit: Years later, cue sound of crickets, despite 40,000 tourists and thousands of researchers and workers going to Antarctica every year, no one has taken me up on this offer.
.
.
It's funny as hell, because only after posting the text 👆 under the 2015 video on YouTube did I just now read the post script, calling out the Flat Earth people with the entertaining comments. Bold for emphasis absolutely fucking added:
> Flat Earth people, you are very entertaining with your comments. My challenge to you: put your money where your mouth is and book a cruise ship holiday to Antarctica below the Antarctic circle to prove the video wrong. **I'll even reimburse the cost of your trip if you can prove the sun does not do this as shown in this video... Edit: Years later, cue sound of crickets, despite 40,000 tourists and thousands of researchers and workers going to Antarctica every year, no one has taken me up on this offer.**
I few more nails in the coffin of that idiotic Globebusters flat earth "proof" video.
👆 If you didn't clearly see it already at the end of the original 2015 video, there is a video snippet of the watch rotating with the primary camera that's on the tripod, making that time lapse video.
👆 The top segment in the above picture is a screen shot (from the original 2015 video) of the wrist watch that the Globebuster idiot says is purely CGI fakery and doesn't exist. The middle and bottom segments of that above picture are screen shots of that same **REAL** wrist watch that is clearly visible at the end of the original 2015 video, recorded by the secondary camera, which the Globebuster swindler conveniently leaves out of his deceptive video.