Message from @MaskedHeathen
Discord ID: 632267570845581333
The author said what I wanted to say.
In the screenshot.
@Deleted User She's clueless
@Deleted User
She doesn't understand the words
She's framing up her revision, which BTW falls apart when the etymological value of the words contrary to her muddle denies her revisionist assertion.
@Deleted User .... I can’t say yes, but honestly I won’t stop you
👍
I'll be respectful, even though he isn't.
I believe you are still a member in my server. If you ever get tired of the relentless, pointless arguing, stop in & see us.
Awe thanks
But we have found the solution to our problem, this channel will be friendly again soon ☺️
Really?!
Yup!
Impressive
What solution?
We are making rules to each channel
Lol, the final solution
Hmmm
Hmmm
No bad AZ
We back at fighting abouth Lilth thing again?
Oh rules. That's gonna be dope. You guys gonna make a debate and discussion channel tab?
I believe that solution is sound
Already there
It’s been there
Text? Not voice
I already made my points.
@MaskedHeathen. Have one, its never used
My bad
Im blind.
What is this? Text? 😱
@MaskedHeathen Hey man how goes?
Pretty good. At work currently.
Good rule good rule
@Deleted User do you know how bad I wanted to make rule two “eat my ass”
Something tells me these guys would eat it if it were presented & offered.
New Religion channel
@MaskedHeathen She already lost. She asserted Babylonian mythology & tried graphting לילית into the Biblical narrative contrary to the literal scripture which identifies an allusion to Babylonian legacies per Babylonian false idols; she claimed *"Lilith"* is Biblically identified as an anthropomorphic character, specifically *"Adam's 1st wife (which is untrue, & unbiblical)."* She got the etymology wrong, & ate her words. 1 day later, she's still stuck on her loss
The end
Lol