*iz summoned*

@bible whore 1 Be lazy then. That's ur burden. I don't cater to frivolous pursuits, & I'm not your babysitter girly. Have a wonderful morning. 💪🌞 ☕ Bless you & Max in the name of Yahushua

@MaxIgnoramus yes, this somehow dtarted over my comment

To. @Deleted User

@Deleted User I’m just asking for your source

The source was Wikipedia

*waves*

@Deleted User het

Okay, so can be changed by anyone

Hey

hey max

@Deleted User hello

@Deleted User. Waves back

hey bible

hi @NoOne

Wikipedia is not a reliable source

it's pretty decent

@Deleted User a stopped clock is right twice a day

wikipedia is sure better than encyclopedias

Not really it a beta test on control of information

well censorship of more controversial views is mostly from the public self enforcing

@Deleted User. Then use the wayback machine

always wondered about all the 90's webpages that had diamonds of great info that went poof

@Deleted User. Wayback

didn't capture everything

@Deleted User Dont rely on Wiki then, rely on the facts; in any scenario, factual details prior to Wikipedia aren't a creation of Wikipedia *(that would implicate Wiki as a promoter of facts in such cases).* Step ur game up & research as I have. Burden is on y'all to verify verifiable details when it correlates to your presupposed doubt. 👌 That's all

Don't be lazy

@Deleted Useragreed

so what's everyone's opinion on free energy tech?

@Deleted User @Deleted User
I have to agree with Operator on this. Wiki can be changed, false info, and simply trolled on.

@Deleted User Free energy?

yeah

@MaskedHeathen Right on bro

👊

@MaskedHeathen. Wiki is a good starting point

No it ain't.

is free energy tech real or no?

Even a liberal college student can tell you that.

@Deleted User mmmmm no.

@Deleted User. Some

no? really?