Message from @AZ infidel
Discord ID: 632987869652189205
You wanted sources from Fox last night (rightfully)
hellos
Now itβs rude to ask for them?
*iz summoned*
@bible whore 1 Be lazy then. That's ur burden. I don't cater to frivolous pursuits, & I'm not your babysitter girly. Have a wonderful morning. πͺπ β Bless you & Max in the name of Yahushua
@MaxIgnoramus yes, this somehow dtarted over my comment
To. @Deleted User
@Deleted User Iβm just asking for your source
The source was Wikipedia
*waves*
@Deleted User het
Okay, so can be changed by anyone
Hey
hey max
@Deleted User hello
@Deleted User. Waves back
hey bible
hi @NoOne
Wikipedia is not a reliable source
it's pretty decent
wikipedia is sure better than encyclopedias
Not really it a beta test on control of information
well censorship of more controversial views is mostly from the public self enforcing
@Deleted User. Then use the wayback machine
always wondered about all the 90's webpages that had diamonds of great info that went poof
@Deleted User. Wayback
didn't capture everything
@Deleted User Dont rely on Wiki then, rely on the facts; in any scenario, factual details prior to Wikipedia aren't a creation of Wikipedia *(that would implicate Wiki as a promoter of facts in such cases).* Step ur game up & research as I have. Burden is on y'all to verify verifiable details when it correlates to your presupposed doubt. π That's all
Don't be lazy
@Deleted Useragreed
so what's everyone's opinion on free energy tech?
@Deleted User @Deleted User
I have to agree with Operator on this. Wiki can be changed, false info, and simply trolled on.
@Deleted User Free energy?
yeah
@MaskedHeathen Right on bro
π
@MaskedHeathen. Wiki is a good starting point
No it ain't.
is free energy tech real or no?
Even a liberal college student can tell you that.