I’m asking for his source

Because

You can look it up and see a different source and not know what he is seeing to draw his conclusion

@bible whore 1 its up yo you to rebut

Post something

I need the source to see the full info in order to rebut or not

Not just snippets

@bible whore 1 then your lazy

??

@bible whore 1
@MaxIgnoramus
Lol! The orbiters are in effect. I realize you're both desperate to discredit me becuz *(especially u Bible whore, considering Im on ur "shit list," as you've revealed),* but have a little dignity & don't be lazy. When one verfies details, they typically verify the info itself.

Did I miss something

I just asked for your source of information

@AZ infidel do you know bible whore is talking to operator?

You wanted sources from Fox last night (rightfully)

hellos

Now it’s rude to ask for them?

*iz summoned*

@bible whore 1 Be lazy then. That's ur burden. I don't cater to frivolous pursuits, & I'm not your babysitter girly. Have a wonderful morning. 💪🌞 ☕ Bless you & Max in the name of Yahushua

@MaxIgnoramus yes, this somehow dtarted over my comment

To. @Deleted User

@Deleted User I’m just asking for your source

The source was Wikipedia

*waves*

@Deleted User het

Okay, so can be changed by anyone

Hey

hey max

@Deleted User hello

@Deleted User. Waves back

hey bible

hi @NoOne

Wikipedia is not a reliable source

it's pretty decent

@Deleted User a stopped clock is right twice a day

wikipedia is sure better than encyclopedias

Not really it a beta test on control of information

well censorship of more controversial views is mostly from the public self enforcing

@Deleted User. Then use the wayback machine

always wondered about all the 90's webpages that had diamonds of great info that went poof

@Deleted User. Wayback

didn't capture everything