I have mad communism vibes from u

Any reasons?

I just do

Idk why

Anyone up

Yes sir

Aye.

Howdy

Have I told you about this redneck girl I was taking to.

No

Wait let’s go in general chat

Any1 wanna debate Trump versus Biden winning ?

Trump will win fuck you

🤣

Boom I just won

@Nojogo02

Damn you got me

Communist bullshit 🛑- -🔫👮🏻‍♀️

What do you guys think of my prediction

Im hoping

that is accurate

honestly

Hooters hires women with big boobs not only for sex appeal but also because you need milk for when things are hot

Oof

Damnit wrong chat

https://hub.jhu.edu/2017/01/11/vaccines-autism-public-health-expert/

just for anyone thats confused

my dislike of vaccines has nothing to do with autism

Yea no this isnt for your you really its for kevin

Who believes vaccines are toxic period

yes they are

they have been proven to insome cases cause autism

Could you show me the studies? I'm curious

I'd like to read them

yes one moment

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuMbRBTZhCY

First of all: I asked for a study *showing* the link, not for a YouTube video of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. just *saying* that vaccines are dangerous

However, because I'm a nice guy, I watched the video anyway - but there are still a few big problems with it

My biggest issue here is the fact that RFK's only real "evidence" is the 1967 incident where two infants died and numerous others got sick when given an RSV vaccine. While this incident was absolutely horrifying, it's important to understand *why* exactly such a strongly negative reaction was exhibited in the first place. Professional studies that took place after the incident recognized that the deaths were due to the fact that the children had weaker antibodies (due to the fact that they were literal toddlers), causing the vaccine to not work as intended.

This is not an indictment of the concept of vaccines as a whole, it just means that the scientists conducting the study at the time hadn't realized how dangerous it was to perform such a test on young children; Science has come a long way since then, which illustrates a second problem with using that study: It was so long ago that it's honestly hardly relevant by this point. We know better now. **That's what science is all about: Learning from our past mistakes and determining how to do better**.