2. I already explained why he can't pull it off, even with the help from the 2000 election lawyers - the situation is extremely different this time around.

If it comes down to the SCOTUS, he has a 5-4 decision. Those 5 I named also have a score to sell with the Democrats who tired to ruin their reputation during their confirmation hearings.

US Army also seized this Gem of Evidence.

For what it's worth, I've been following the SCOTUS situation pretty thoroughly, and that doesn't seem like it's going very well for Trump either. Almost all of their cases and appeals are being thrown out due to a lack of evidence.

I guess technically you're right that the SCOTUS could rule in Trump's favor and that would be his last chance at overturning it, but until even the tiniest shred of evidence of legitimate widespread voter fraud shows up, the chances of that are basically zero.

Ye of little faith. Stop being a doubting Thomas. As my buddy Larry Mcreynolds told all of his drivers, reach up there and pull those belts tight. Why do I say that? Well, it's going to be interesting from here on out

I have faith in facts and evidence. I'll stop being a "doubting Thomas" once there's any actual indication that Trump could win this thing after all 😛

He plays 4D chess for a reason

Do you know what that reason is?

Since you seem to know everything, you figure it out

Excuse me? I explicitly said that I have faith in things that are supported by facts and evidence - implying that I don't know anything, until something comes out to support a conclusion. If I already knew the outcome, I wouldn't waste my time talking to others about it.

Similarly, as far as I can tell, there's no evidence to support that Trump plays "4D chess", or that he has a reason for whatever he's doing right now. You said that, and I asked about it.

Why is he doing what he is doing? Because the Democrats cried about a fix when there wasn't one, just plenty of American's tired of the bull and now when it looks like a walk away again, they quit counting votes in the middle of the night and Joe magically has the lead the next day. I even sat there and watched them call off states for Joe 2 minutes after the polls were closed and not one vote was counted yet.

Media does not determine who wins. Even Dennis Prager said this country was set up for a small number of absentee ballots but not on a mass scale like we had. That is a big risk for rigging. There's even video evidence of a poll worker fulling out blank ballots for an hour or so. All for Joe. So yes, this election is highly illegal.

Of course the media doesn't independently decide the winner - no one is saying that. The media **does**, however, tell us who is most likely to win, based on the votes that have been reported to them. You have to keep in mind, when they call certain states for certain candidates, they're not pulling the answer out of thin air; they're calling the states as such due to statistical information based on which candidate has gotten enough votes in certain counties and areas to the point where it's extremely unlikely that the "losing" candidate in that particular area could ever come back from it. There is also a historical factor to consider -- the reason why some states like NY and Louisiana were called before many votes were counted is because they (among others) are known for pretty much always swinging a certain way.

So yeah, "the media does not determine who wins" and all that, but that doesn't mean the information they report on is unreliable.

Also, if you're talking about the video I think you're talking about, then that was a re-tabulation of votes, and was monitored by both Republican and Democratic poll-watchers. There was nothing illegal about that.

Whatever

Only thing I am seeing is the local courts throwing it out which is how the legal chain of command works. You can't just go to the Supreme Court, you have to go through the whole appeals process. It's a long way to January 20th

Also consider at least 30 some odd states report the same "glitch" using either Dominion or another counter.

> Also, if you're talking about the video I think you're talking about, then that was a re-tabulation of votes, and was monitored by both Republican and Democratic poll-watchers. There was nothing illegal about that.
@K.T.B. untrue lol

thats on instance

of many

the whole dominion software system is in question

Very much in question. Now, there is also 2 other software sytems that cause problems however, the states Trump had the lead in and then lost it in overnight used Dominion

@K.T.B. is a democrat

Y'all should have known by now

I'm not a democrat, I just don't really trust hearsay and speculation all that much

@figgs the rules does not prohibit her from taking part in this channel

@K.T.B. I was in the middle of typing that when you gave your response.

I'm pretty critical of democrats as well - if there were more dems in this server, you'd probably see me being skeptical about the things they say as well

@K.T.B. My point being is thay I didn't see a rule that made their participation illegal

Right

GA

Just started using Dominion

in 2020

and all of a sudden it flips blue

really makes you think

In disgusting, vile cities that are crime-ridden --

This will go to the Supreme Court and it will glorious. Make liberals cry again 2020