Message from @Swampfox169
Discord ID: 777750110594793503
๐
I actually expected better from u ktb
I don't understand - what's the problem with what I said?
I verified the information before sending it with the information provided on the National Institution of Health website (not that I really needed to do so, since I assumed that was common knowledge anyway).
Yeah itโs true
There Asians
Itโs like saying English and American is a race
You called a professor out for lying? About what?
Posted by a Southern Gospel quartet I listen to
He said the election could never flip to trump
And I said it could and he should stop lying
That's not really a lie, though. Even if he's proven wrong (which is extraordinarily unlikely), that's more of a speculation thing, rather than him spreading blatant falsehoods.
Besides, I would agree with him anyway. This isn't like the 2000 election where Bush's and Gore's votes were off by only a few hundred votes in a single state - this time around, Biden's ahead of Trump by tens of thousands of votes in multiple states. Not even recounts can help with that.
So why do you doubt Trump can pull it off? He has the 3 lawyers on the side of President Bush from 2000 on the supreme court. Plus Alito and Clarence Thomas.
Plus he also has the former Mayor of NYC who took down 5 mafia families. If he could do that, he could easily help Trump right this wrong
1. You're comparing apples to oranges with the mafia thing, I don't see what relevance that has, as Rudy Giuliani having indicted the Five Families in 1986 is a totally different skillset from trying to overturn an election.
2. I already explained why he can't pull it off, even with the help from the 2000 election lawyers - the situation is extremely different this time around.
If it comes down to the SCOTUS, he has a 5-4 decision. Those 5 I named also have a score to sell with the Democrats who tired to ruin their reputation during their confirmation hearings.
For what it's worth, I've been following the SCOTUS situation pretty thoroughly, and that doesn't seem like it's going very well for Trump either. Almost all of their cases and appeals are being thrown out due to a lack of evidence.
I guess technically you're right that the SCOTUS could rule in Trump's favor and that would be his last chance at overturning it, but until even the tiniest shred of evidence of legitimate widespread voter fraud shows up, the chances of that are basically zero.
Ye of little faith. Stop being a doubting Thomas. As my buddy Larry Mcreynolds told all of his drivers, reach up there and pull those belts tight. Why do I say that? Well, it's going to be interesting from here on out
I have faith in facts and evidence. I'll stop being a "doubting Thomas" once there's any actual indication that Trump could win this thing after all ๐
He plays 4D chess for a reason
Do you know what that reason is?
Since you seem to know everything, you figure it out
Excuse me? I explicitly said that I have faith in things that are supported by facts and evidence - implying that I don't know anything, until something comes out to support a conclusion. If I already knew the outcome, I wouldn't waste my time talking to others about it.
Similarly, as far as I can tell, there's no evidence to support that Trump plays "4D chess", or that he has a reason for whatever he's doing right now. You said that, and I asked about it.
Why is he doing what he is doing? Because the Democrats cried about a fix when there wasn't one, just plenty of American's tired of the bull and now when it looks like a walk away again, they quit counting votes in the middle of the night and Joe magically has the lead the next day. I even sat there and watched them call off states for Joe 2 minutes after the polls were closed and not one vote was counted yet.
Media does not determine who wins. Even Dennis Prager said this country was set up for a small number of absentee ballots but not on a mass scale like we had. That is a big risk for rigging. There's even video evidence of a poll worker fulling out blank ballots for an hour or so. All for Joe. So yes, this election is highly illegal.
Of course the media doesn't independently decide the winner - no one is saying that. The media **does**, however, tell us who is most likely to win, based on the votes that have been reported to them. You have to keep in mind, when they call certain states for certain candidates, they're not pulling the answer out of thin air; they're calling the states as such due to statistical information based on which candidate has gotten enough votes in certain counties and areas to the point where it's extremely unlikely that the "losing" candidate in that particular area could ever come back from it. There is also a historical factor to consider -- the reason why some states like NY and Louisiana were called before many votes were counted is because they (among others) are known for pretty much always swinging a certain way.
So yeah, "the media does not determine who wins" and all that, but that doesn't mean the information they report on is unreliable.
Also, if you're talking about the video I think you're talking about, then that was a re-tabulation of votes, and was monitored by both Republican and Democratic poll-watchers. There was nothing illegal about that.
Whatever
Only thing I am seeing is the local courts throwing it out which is how the legal chain of command works. You can't just go to the Supreme Court, you have to go through the whole appeals process. It's a long way to January 20th
Also consider at least 30 some odd states report the same "glitch" using either Dominion or another counter.
> Also, if you're talking about the video I think you're talking about, then that was a re-tabulation of votes, and was monitored by both Republican and Democratic poll-watchers. There was nothing illegal about that.
@K.T.B. untrue lol
thats on instance
of many