Message from @WarlordStarfire

Discord ID: 789547051292688394


2020-12-18 16:47:27 UTC  

Takes vaccine shot

2020-12-18 16:47:36 UTC  

Faints

2020-12-18 16:47:47 UTC  

Maybe it wasn't the vaccine

2020-12-18 16:48:05 UTC  

Oh, you said "before" getting the vaccine. That must have been a typo, then.

2020-12-18 16:48:08 UTC  

That's 6

2020-12-18 16:48:16 UTC  

Ppl so far

2020-12-18 16:48:24 UTC  

Either way, it doesn't change what I said above, so... Keep trying, I guess.

2020-12-18 16:48:33 UTC  

Oh I will

2020-12-18 16:49:01 UTC  

Maybe I can get my friend who got hurt bad from vaccines and hear her experience from it

2020-12-18 16:49:28 UTC  

I'd love to talk to her, actually.

2020-12-18 17:10:33 UTC  

The cure shouldn't be worse than the virus and for healthy people under the age of 60 it seems to be.

2020-12-18 17:12:31 UTC  

You and I have different interpretations on the definition of the word "worse". I'd rather have a tiny minority of people faint than have a tiny minority of people die, no matter the age group of the people affected.

2020-12-18 17:21:38 UTC  

This virus is not a danger to healthy people under the age of 60 and the lockdowns and vaccine seem to be worse than just getting the virus.

2020-12-18 17:24:40 UTC  

The lockdowns didn’t help lower the number of infected in California and they have the strictest lockdown in our country alongside NY. Texas is doing better then both and we are still up there in infections

2020-12-18 17:27:10 UTC  

And masks don’t help, they actually hurt you. We as humans aren’t built to breath on through fabric. Everyday you go outside you breath little bit of harmful substances that your body slowly grows immune to. If you cover your month your just preventing your body from releasing toxic waste.

2020-12-18 17:29:11 UTC  

Please post a link to a formal study or research result that agrees with your claim, or else this is just meaningless conjecture.

2020-12-18 17:32:53 UTC  

Didn’t know I had to post a link to common sense but I’ll get you on my break

2020-12-18 17:35:19 UTC  

How is it common sense? There are literally dozens of formal studies in the past few months that completely, unanimously disagree with you. Making a personal conclusion and calling it "common sense" is not knowledge; that's arrogance.

2020-12-18 17:35:55 UTC  

And, unlike you, I *have* posted links to research papers that corroborate my claim. I've done it before, and I'll do it again right now:

2020-12-18 17:38:06 UTC  

oh really KTB its not common sense that destroying peoples livelihood is horrible

2020-12-18 17:38:52 UTC  

Here is a brief summary of the conclusions found by said studies. Notice that every single claim made on this page is backed up with a citation at the bottom of the page, including links to papers going into excruciating detail on how each study was conducted, including the methods of how the research was conducted.

2020-12-18 17:39:11 UTC  

You're free to criticize the methods described, but to just say "nah it's common sense" is an invalid rebuttal.

2020-12-18 17:39:26 UTC  

Did I not say I’ll get you a link on my break? are you that impatient?

2020-12-18 17:39:39 UTC  

is that from the same cdc that told people not to wear a mask?

2020-12-18 17:40:13 UTC  

I'm just criticizing your statement about it being common sense, I understand you're busy at the moment.

2020-12-18 17:40:15 UTC  

God damn 😂 the cdc has been going back on their word this whole year KTB

2020-12-18 17:41:06 UTC  

First the day lockdowns and mask work, then they change their minds, then they go back to saying it works and then change their minds again

2020-12-18 17:41:18 UTC  

Uh... read my message again, maybe? The CDC themselves aren't the ones who conducted those studies, the CDC page I linked is just an archive of links to actual studies conducted by third-party research institutions that are unaffiliated with the CDC directly.

2020-12-18 17:43:17 UTC  

Additionally, I don't see why it matters if they backpedaled a few times. That's just how science works: we advise the public based on what we currently know, and if enough studies contradict our current knowledge, then we update what's being advised to the public based on the new knowledge. It would be far more suspicious if the CDC was giving the same advice that it was back then. *That* would be bad science.

2020-12-18 17:43:38 UTC  

It's also how knowledge in general works. You shouldn't stick with old knowledge when new evidence is contradictory.

2020-12-18 17:44:27 UTC  

I'm saying the lockdowns have been worse than the virus for almost the entire population.

2020-12-18 17:46:09 UTC  

655,000 Americans die from heart dieses every year why don't we make a big deal out of that.

2020-12-18 17:46:45 UTC  

Because shutting down non-essential businesses won't prevent heart disease?

2020-12-18 17:46:54 UTC  

This whole pandemic has been almost completely political.

2020-12-18 17:47:19 UTC  

okay why don't we just shut down every unhealthy restaurant?

2020-12-18 17:47:38 UTC  

That would take away people's freedoms!

2020-12-18 17:47:53 UTC  

What if I want to get heart disease!

2020-12-18 17:48:00 UTC  

EXACTLY

2020-12-18 17:50:50 UTC  

There is inherent danger in life and destroying millions of small businesses isn't worth it to combat a virus with an extremally low death rate like covid.

2020-12-18 17:55:16 UTC  

I understand what you're saying, but the reason why your comparison is not very good is because there's an element of choice involved with most other **preventable** illnesses. If I decide to increase my risk of a heart attack by going to McDonald's, that's something that will affect me alone. If I think I may have Covid and I go to the store, suddenly other innocent, unknowing people around me are at risk despite that not being what they signed up for. It's unfair. There's a world of difference between that and your heart disease analogy.