If we started with a nationwide history program that was enforced in every single state then maybe people would actually know what the constitution says.

So how do you build a new ship if the designs are contradictory in some aspects?

We don’t want to create another system of “well... close enough” for beliefs or we will end up in another 2 party system compromise.

Establish enough common ground to make it acceptable by multiple people and then if any questions were to arise refer to the constitution.

No two people will ever agree on everything wholeheartedly. If they do one of them is lying for the sake of the other.

https://youtu.be/3Hifxf1D4LM lol hodgetwins complaining sure does feel comforting right now 😂

The constitution needs some help... more protects for the current age. The corruption has found pathways that once never existed.

And there is no room for growth. A political party needs to be able to grow. It needs to be able to change with the times. As new information is given the party needs to be able to interpret the information and adapt and make an educated decision.

The corruption found its way in through state governed systems because many are unconstitutional

Yes, but stability is essential in some cases, changing fluidly based off of what you hear, experience will not always instill confidence.

Absolutely. But that does not mean that the system is corrupt. It means that the system has been overcome by people who are corrupted.

The checks for that should be the federal level but since a certain party has been super partisan, those checks failed.

We need to go back to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

We got to this level of corruption because of loopholes and flaws. We need to find those and seal them up if we have any plans for a brighter future.

I am going to go to bed before I get to infused lol

I am not the leader the people need, but rather a deep thinker and a problem solver.

True. It’s Almost midnight.

Then you are the leader’s right hand man. Don’t sell yourself short bro

@AlexanderTorri at least you're thinking, that's more than most.

Definitely not selling myself short, just accepting of my own limitations

Too true @Humanoid Typhoon

The future is up to people who can still have civil discourse.

And agree and disagree without coming to violence.

Your strengths fill in the gaps for someone else. I would be a shit leader but I am a great doer. I make things happen. I get people to do things and work together. Those are my strengths. I make things happen but I can’t be the face of a movement. I wish I could be. But it’s not for me.

Or personal attacks.

My belief is you should only use the methods and tactics utilized by the others to challenge. Anything beyond or less is necessary. Fight democracy ideology with democracy ideology. Fight republic ideology with republic ideology. Fight totalitarian ideology with totalitarian ideology.

Unnecessary*

Play the game being played, you know?

I would always rather maintain a position of integrity. But the phrase fight fire with fire exist for a reason.

I am all about integrity

I agree 100% there

Goodnight everyone ☺️

Later

Nite bro

Hope to chat again!

I shall

@Humanoid Typhoon I would have agreed a few days ago, but the people entering the capitol that did no harm to anyone, bared no weapons, didn't destroy the place, and someone got killed and they got DEFAMED and destroyed on social media makes me now think different.

It doesn't matter at all how civil you are with your protests, you will be labelled a white-supremist evil terrorist regardless what you do or don't do.

That is why 230 needs to be repealed.

^

It’s no longer about conflicting information it’s about false narratives to persuade the masses to believe things that are simply not true.