Message from @Piratesteve5
Discord ID: 797650586564034610
True tho
@Schlimmy Fongrel With out Looking at the EVIDENCE.... What Part do you not Understand? The Not Looking at the evidence part, or the Not Looking at the Evidence part.
IF real judges took the time to look at the evidence
we would of won the war
but nope
THEY ARE REAL JUDGES
Not in my book
well if im gonna rephrase
You have no reason to believe otherwise BESIDES the fact that they didn’t rule the way you wanted or expected
A real Judge would have the courage to look at the evidence and weigh it against the arguments.
Patriotic Judges took the time at the evidence
Why do you know what a real judge does?
Because we have seen it. Look up Chief Justice John Marshall.
I take back Real Judge back that was my fault
I don’t even know the court details. If I could get the 60 cases in PDF format I would gladly read it and then make a proper argument— but NOBODY KNOWS — and that’s the issue
I won't.
Okay
We aren’t privy to the very issue that we seek transparency on!
A real judge would have taken the cases and tried them by the merits of the case. I.E. the EVIDENCE. Not Dismissed with out even taking a second thought of anything else.
why did thousands of people sign affidavits?
The cases were not dismissed before looking at the evidence, but I have seem many of the dismissals, by Trump appointed judges, they WERE dismissed because of a LACK of evidence. Look up hearsay
Hearsay is not evidence
Sorry they were Dismissed before they looked at the Evidence.
People risked their livelihoods over coming forward.. does that not merit anything??
Hearsay was the main arguments in most of the cases
False
NOT IN A COURT OF LAW, that would make the legal process unjust
False @Schlimmy Fongrel but I am done arguing with you. Keep drinking the Kool Aid man. It will not kill you...
Signed affidavits under oath do not warrant further investigation?
They came forward because their dear Pres wanted them to come forward and kept saying that there was widespread fraud
You know the courts in the state didnt change rules that the legislature didnt accept
but there is nothing to see here
If the signed affidavit says that the witness saw something suspicious, then no. If the witness brings forward evidence, then yes.
And the last minute election law changes that bypassed legislation?
How bout dat
@Schlimmy Fongrel Why are you even hear if you do not get the main point of this whole argument? Our government has Stopped functioning properly.... This is a big fucking problem. So either you want to fix it or just move somewhere else. It seems like you just do not care.
I am here because I have no intention of surrounding myself with people that agree with me. I know y’all disagree with me, and debate is important. Anyway I had a good time and now I have irl shit to get back to, thank y’all and I’ll hopefully be back 👍
I think our government sucks for other reasons... 😂
IG there was actually no "evidence" of "voter fraud"
Yeah. Good talk man. I sincerely like you here because echo chambers get lonely