Message from @Iol12
Discord ID: 797650218698276905
@Schlimmy Fongrel No court case failed on Evidence. All those cases were dismissed before evidence was even opened or looked at. No arguments no nothing. Just straight up Dismissals. That should send Red Flags every where.....
Why won’t they allow the forensic audit. It’s all anybody doubting ever wanted
But even Trump’s OWN judges dismissed the cases, does that not mean anything?
why is everyone is afraid of a simple forensic audit?
Idk, I'm guessing that he didnt know he elected pussies
And no — I personally would not have “stormed” the capitol. But if a nice police officer opens the bicycle rack gates like that for me then that’s a freaking invitation 😫
but ok
True tho
@Schlimmy Fongrel With out Looking at the EVIDENCE.... What Part do you not Understand? The Not Looking at the evidence part, or the Not Looking at the Evidence part.
IF real judges took the time to look at the evidence
we would of won the war
but nope
THEY ARE REAL JUDGES
Not in my book
well if im gonna rephrase
You have no reason to believe otherwise BESIDES the fact that they didn’t rule the way you wanted or expected
A real Judge would have the courage to look at the evidence and weigh it against the arguments.
Patriotic Judges took the time at the evidence
Why do you know what a real judge does?
Because we have seen it. Look up Chief Justice John Marshall.
I don’t even know the court details. If I could get the 60 cases in PDF format I would gladly read it and then make a proper argument— but NOBODY KNOWS — and that’s the issue
I won't.
Okay
We aren’t privy to the very issue that we seek transparency on!
A real judge would have taken the cases and tried them by the merits of the case. I.E. the EVIDENCE. Not Dismissed with out even taking a second thought of anything else.
why did thousands of people sign affidavits?
Our Government has stopped working the Three branches are not holding the others Accountable.
The cases were not dismissed before looking at the evidence, but I have seem many of the dismissals, by Trump appointed judges, they WERE dismissed because of a LACK of evidence. Look up hearsay
Hearsay is not evidence
Sorry they were Dismissed before they looked at the Evidence.
People risked their livelihoods over coming forward.. does that not merit anything??
Hearsay was the main arguments in most of the cases
False
NOT IN A COURT OF LAW, that would make the legal process unjust
False @Schlimmy Fongrel but I am done arguing with you. Keep drinking the Kool Aid man. It will not kill you...
Signed affidavits under oath do not warrant further investigation?
They came forward because their dear Pres wanted them to come forward and kept saying that there was widespread fraud
You know the courts in the state didnt change rules that the legislature didnt accept
but there is nothing to see here
If the signed affidavit says that the witness saw something suspicious, then no. If the witness brings forward evidence, then yes.