Ya, I know you two have (from my POV) always seemed to have a bit of an adversarial back & forth, but to just come in here & drop what he did today like that.......wasn't a good look.

Of course I may be speaking out of turn because I don’t know the full backstory (just joined)

Maybe his remarks were displaced and expression is not his forte

@JDMOONAN I only had to watch a hand full of your youtube vids to know you'd gather people n your disc that weren't delusional.

I'm impressed w/ JDs growth the last couple months.

He was just trolling with sarcasm as a way to vent his frustrations. I’ve seen it in plenty of gaming communities where a small guild suddenly blows up and people feel like it ain’t what it once was. He might’ve felt discarded or a lack of identity (again, just purely speculation on my ~~pet~~ part)

Saved. Thank you

@Livingstone You get to sleep ok last night?

No. I got out of bed. Made cookies. And watched a few makeup tutorials. The whole cyclical catastrophes and nature of magnetic fields and theories being classified left me in a bad way.

That being said... I will probably continue all the videos in the series, just not before bed.

Ya, it's a great series, I watched before bed too, didn't sleep at all that night.

He does daily weather reports, I've become a fan.

JD has to do a back channel for the YouTube podcast? That is some bologna. I haven’t gotten used to rumble yet. Guess it’s time to get acquainted.

Tonight at 7! See y’all there!

Small thing, but Alex Jones is not a reliable source for breaking things down. I have watched episodes where he uses a normal human voice, but he still has bouts of insanity and I don’t trust him. As for the other sources, the NYT article is based on a source that recognized them, but just *believes* they are right: “The infiltrators were recognized due to their participation in New York City demonstrations, and were believed to have joined in the rioting so that Trump would get blamed, the source said.” And then then end of the article calls out how the Washington Times article was false and misleading. The NewsMax article has a quote from the Rep. that the article is based on saying this: ““Now, whether these people who did the actual violence were antifa, or antifa plus Trump supporters, or only Trump supporters, or anarchists, or somebody else, we really need to wait until an investigation has been conducted, and not jump to conclusions when the evidence is incomplete.”” Then the videos of people saying “no Antifa”, how does that prove anything? Because some people saw others breaking windows and started chanting? That doesn’t mean the people were actually a part of antifa, it’s just that the chanters were more sensible than the ppl breaking windows and started booing the window breakers. And finally the last one doesn’t even prove the dude was a dem, he just didn’t vote. And that’s assuming the tweet was true fact even tho it just shows an excel sheet that is severely clipped. I’m not saying it’s false, just that it doesn’t prove he was antifa or anything, if it is true. Now before you respond, hear me out: I will believe anything, if there is enough evidence to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. Currently, the evidence makes me believe it was almost all Trump supporters causing mayhem at the capitol. I mean ultimately we have to wait, I just don’t think this evidence is substantial enough.

Oh shit, that was in response to Meiglos from yesterday

More evidence will make its way into the public view. It’s good that you think critically and identify sources. Everyone should. But once there are reputable sources that prove without a doubt that it was not Trump supporters and that people were planted then it’s important to share those sources.

It was mostly Trump supporters though, right?

Yeah, i believe so, it would take tremendous evidence to prove otherwise

Seems like Q people and some non-genuine people were the tip of the spear entering the building

And then the patriots followed in

I think it was most likely a mix of extremists at the front lines (Q, PBs, maybe actors idk), then the VAST majority of ppl just kinda followed the crowd until they were standing in the capitol, and none of them understood wtf they were doing there.

Yep

And then some secret service people who went in to grab the laptops

Makes it seems like that was the plan... which is kind of shitty because it means that someone tricked Trump supporters into breaking the law to create a distraction

Meaning that a few people died and potentially some will go to jail

But I guess, that's war. You allow some of your people to get killed so that millions more don't have to die.

What about a distraction? I haven’t heard about this.

Well, did you see how some highly coordinated men in black jackets, face masks and glasses were moving through the crowds and allegedly they had the laptops?

Pelosi's laptop etc

I heard someone took Pelosi’s laptop, but idk anything beyond.

Looked like two different entrances

Yeah. They also took multiple other peoples' laptops

And there's video of these secret service-lookin people in the capitol

I'll see if I can find it

The break-in, happened off to the side. Radicals? Trump supporters? antifa? Gov't agitators? - No idea.
Most ppl walked in peacefully through the unlocked front door, after police retreated & waved the large crowd in.

Yeah I agree Meiglos, whatever happened ended up putting a lot of peaceful American’s in a really bad situation just because the crowd was aided in gaining access. It’s super fucked up for those people

I dunno, I'm not able to find this video

hello

It shows secret service running down a staircase in the Capitol and a bunch of patriots are yelling at them for some reason