Message from @ManOWar
Discord ID: 628338054536495104
I would take the Abrams to it tbh
Less crew needed, less maintenance, smaller, less fuel
I'd probably go T-90 if I was a company
If I was a military I can just write a blank check
So Abrams is fine
T-90 is more vulnerable to atgms and rpgs
You guys talking about modern tanks?
Nice
More or less
Also there is not alot of t-90s
So keep that in mind
Damn that shit about Sweden though
Thought you guys were talking about Terminators
If I could just go with anything for cost I'd probably pick a K2 since it has an autoloader
It's expensive as shit
But I like autoloading designs
I would always go with a Leopard 2
Deutch quality
Leopards are pretty cost efficient
Not as much as russian
Abrams is about 8.2 million per unit, t-90 is about 5m per unit
Yee
2A6 Leopard is 5.7mil us dollars
Comparison of m1a2 to the t-90ms
I think a leopard 2a5 with a slightly better engine would be the perfect middle ground
Good armor while being cheap and fast
^
The leopard is a great tank
The T-90 is really just a T-72. There's very little distinguishing them other than the engine
Isnt it the best tank in the world?
Leopard 2
That's a subjective thing
Depends on what you want
It's like guns
You want a tank that can perform best in modern battlefields
Thermal and nv, better stabilization of the gun, better engine and better armor
Do you have a large budget?
But it is close
If you mean the most modern and we'll equipped I'd probably go with a K2 or Abrams
There's no such thing as a best tool, only best tool for the situation