Message from @Josh M. -OH

Discord ID: 518619196079341576


2018-12-02 02:38:38 UTC  

White dudes finally had a legit and good reason to go off against the system *that would be supported by most of the more mainstream dissident right

2018-12-02 02:38:47 UTC  

Gotcha @Jacob

2018-12-02 02:39:17 UTC  

eh it wasn't really legitimate

2018-12-02 02:39:38 UTC  

I suppose apathy is the elite's strongest tool. they wait for a protest to dim

2018-12-02 02:39:45 UTC  

Tommy Robinson collaborated with the grooming gangs by giving the judge an excuse to nullify the trial

2018-12-02 02:39:50 UTC  

it was legit enough in their eyes to mass mobilize, their press laws are fuckin retarded anyways

2018-12-02 02:39:55 UTC  

>collaborated

2018-12-02 02:39:56 UTC  

m8 lol

2018-12-02 02:40:18 UTC  

Not the verb I would pick

2018-12-02 02:40:28 UTC  

bc it's inaccurate lol

2018-12-02 02:41:40 UTC  

I disagree with the Greg Johnson take on Tommy.

2018-12-02 02:42:13 UTC  

BritBongs don't disobey their masters often. When they have a reason to awaken the Saxon you don't stop it

2018-12-02 02:42:22 UTC  

If you break laws on reporting on ongoing trials, it gives the judge an excuse to nullify the trial for prejudicing the jury and set the suspects free. You can disagree with the law, but, the fact remains, that he was well aware that the law existed and he was well aware that it would increase the gang's chance of going free.

He assisted them in a literal sense.

2018-12-02 02:43:06 UTC  

The occupied-UK kritarchy was never going to seriously punish the groomers.

2018-12-02 02:43:14 UTC  

collaborating, your word, implies that he worked with them in order to ensure that the grooming gangs would get their mistrial. that is a heavy accusation to levy against a man you don't know.

2018-12-02 02:44:47 UTC  

unless of course you have a behind-the-scenes in with Tommy and know that he wanted to ensure that the grooming gangs would go free to rape more English children, which would be something that the dissident right at large would need to know

2018-12-02 02:46:04 UTC  

Justice vs preventing it from happening again. Tough choice imo

2018-12-02 02:46:57 UTC  

@Wood-Ape - OK/MN It's not like people haven't been convicted in similar cases in the past. Softer punishments than they should have gotten, but still harder than if the trial got nullified.

2018-12-02 02:46:59 UTC  

no one is denying that he acted foolishly. I am aggressively denying that he established relations with the grooming gang in order to "collaborate" with them to secure their mistrial, unless of course someone has evidence that he has done so.

2018-12-02 02:47:29 UTC  

I like Steve McNallen's take he did on Red Ice
https://youtu.be/MjAYoJRVA20

2018-12-02 02:47:31 UTC  

@Sam Southern - TN lol are people actually trying to sell that line?

2018-12-02 02:47:40 UTC  

I'm not saying that he established relations with them, I'm saying that his actions objectively benefitted them

2018-12-02 02:47:50 UTC  

no, you said he collaborated with them

2018-12-02 02:47:56 UTC  

which necessitates a relationship

2018-12-02 02:48:37 UTC  

again, unless you or someone else has evidence that he collaborated with them, that's a heavy accusation backed by nothing.

2018-12-02 02:51:49 UTC  

It's an accusation backed by the fact that he knowingly took action that was beneficial to them. From a moral standpoint, it doesn't matter if personally talked to them or not, because it would have had the same outcome.

It's undeniable that his actions decreased their chance of conviction, and it's undeniable that he knew what he was doing.

2018-12-02 02:52:15 UTC  

😑

2018-12-02 02:52:23 UTC  

an independent action, that everyone agrees was stupid, is incredibly different from "collaboration"

2018-12-02 02:53:10 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/481597551272001546/518620617113600000/IMG_20181201_215254.jpg

2018-12-02 02:53:22 UTC  

you chose a poor word that had implications you apparently didn't consider. everyone agrees he acted foolishly in a way that harmed himself and the case. switch to the second phrasing, and it's actually an accurate statement

2018-12-02 02:54:12 UTC  

Not everyone thinks it was stupid considering that people constantly defend him

2018-12-02 02:54:35 UTC  

Okay how about this

He took actions that had the same effect as collaborating

2018-12-02 02:54:51 UTC  

It was stupid, but again, Free Tommy was bigger than him.

2018-12-02 02:55:16 UTC  

Collaborating with them would necessitate that he is intentionally working with the enemy to undermine both English Nationalism and White people. That has ramifications that far outscope one court case

2018-12-02 02:55:54 UTC  

A tommy-free protest against grooming gangs SHOULD have risen. But didn't. It never did. You work with what you have

2018-12-02 02:56:05 UTC  

Do you think that Tommy is working with Muslims and other nonWhite groups to undermine the English and White people as a whole? Or do you think that he did something stupid?

2018-12-02 02:59:25 UTC  

I think Tommy is legit but he’s also Jewish.

2018-12-02 02:59:58 UTC  

Like if you see his old stuff I don’t think he is some plant or controlled opposition

2018-12-02 03:00:07 UTC  

But he is Jewish sooo

2018-12-02 03:00:12 UTC  

...

2018-12-02 03:00:27 UTC  

Like Stephen Miller and Loony Loomer the absolute Mad Lass.

Heebs can be used.