Message from @NateDahl76

Discord ID: 519212030931238932


2018-12-03 17:49:58 UTC  

Therno gang

2018-12-03 17:50:50 UTC  

That would definitely be something to bring up to DC leadership. I can think of a couple of people who'd be better positioned to leverage a question effectively, lol.

2018-12-03 17:51:07 UTC  

Everyone want to talk to Moly so he gets crowded at events. You have to be clever and quick to meet and talk to him. I was lucky to meet him in the restroom briefly at a DC Thernovich event last year

2018-12-03 17:51:44 UTC  

Yeah but we’re unique

2018-12-03 17:51:57 UTC  

We are interesting. His orbiters are not.

2018-12-03 17:52:07 UTC  

No, I mean within the organization, lol.

2018-12-03 17:52:09 UTC  

@Virgil um yes I agree I’m not the one claiming those things aren’t true

2018-12-03 17:52:36 UTC  

@NateDahl76 Oh. I thought you were talking to me, not @VinceChaos, lol.

2018-12-03 17:52:51 UTC  

Lmao

2018-12-03 17:52:53 UTC  

All good

2018-12-03 17:53:16 UTC  

But yeah therno probably wouldn’t let Patrick for example into something like that

2018-12-03 17:53:38 UTC  

But we could get a few charismatic, upstanding guys into something

2018-12-03 17:53:48 UTC  

@VinceChaos My mistake, I misread your post

2018-12-03 17:54:08 UTC  

@NateDahl76 Maybe Matt could fly in under the radar 😎

2018-12-03 17:56:55 UTC  

@Virgil you’re good. It’s confusing me im not even gonna talk about it anymore. There’s just multiple things wrong with this picture not just the accepting of relations with 14 year olds my God

2018-12-03 17:58:39 UTC  

Moly has accepted the govt power of borders in order to give the USA hope of keeping liberty and civilization alive but will signal his whole ancap shtick for any other policy. Like you’ve already caved dude give it up

2018-12-03 17:58:41 UTC  

If you cloak your arguments in enough layers of sarcasm, detachment, and crudeness, it can be a clutch to cover up your total lack of substance or nuance underneath. Anglin is guilty, ironically, of the same thing guys on the left like Chapo are. They’re insincere because if anyone saw their sincere positions, they’d have almost no support. Anglin can be funny sometimes, but I see no upside to associating with anything in his style.

2018-12-03 18:00:34 UTC  

@VinceChaos It's a topic that's kind of been beaten to death on the fringes, but suffice to say that we can't make any sure assumptions about Moly's identity, and so neither can we make any assumptions that he'll ever come around to advocating for ours.

2018-12-03 18:01:03 UTC  

@VinceChaos it was interesting to watch Molymeme go from ancap to populist during the 2016 election

2018-12-03 18:01:51 UTC  

For Christian IE/Identitarians I'm sure you are familiar with the website Faith and Heritage, and if you aren't you should be: http://faithandheritage.com

2018-12-03 18:03:14 UTC  

We’re metapolitical, not political. The fact that Molyneux is a bit too libertarian is of no concern. I like him

2018-12-03 18:03:20 UTC  

A friend of mine shared a podcast talking to one of the guys running the site that I thought was excellent:
You can find the link in this site: https://identitydixie.com/2018/11/26/rebel-yell-225-nathanael-strickland-faith-heritage/

2018-12-03 18:03:36 UTC  

He’s not a gatekeeper

2018-12-03 18:04:15 UTC  

@Bjorn - MD oh totally. Like Nate I just wanna have a long chat. Someone anyone should be on his show. Even just a call in

2018-12-03 18:04:24 UTC  

I like Molyneux, though I he doesn't get everything right, he's a good guy imo

2018-12-03 18:04:48 UTC  

We at least have to pitch and give him contact info

2018-12-03 18:05:59 UTC  

I read a little book Molyneux put out, The Art of the Argument. Very good, solid read.

2018-12-03 18:06:04 UTC  

@VinceChaos Yeah, I *have* thought that we should call in to FDR (Freedomain Radio), though his assistant, Mike, is probably a pretty sharp screener, so we'd have to be one point.

2018-12-03 18:06:24 UTC  

@MrBland - VA Yeah, it's on my list, though who knows if I'll ever get that far, lol.

2018-12-03 18:06:52 UTC  

It's a short read, like maybe 1-2 sittings

2018-12-03 18:07:04 UTC  

But good solid advice.

2018-12-03 18:07:53 UTC  

@NateDahl76 @VinceChaos At the same time, though, I also worry that, by getting too close, we could start bringing the heat down on his channel, or even his private life (like what's happened with Tucker).

2018-12-03 18:08:39 UTC  

The latter, while obviously being undesirable, would probably only boost his and our profiles, but the former would definitely hurt the cause.

2018-12-03 18:08:52 UTC  

Simple answer to that, and something we’re quite good at. Opsec!

2018-12-03 18:09:26 UTC  

🕵

2018-12-03 18:09:41 UTC  

I think the heat on Tucker was nothing but a good thing.

2018-12-03 18:10:04 UTC  

It pushed him more right imo and made the opposition look bad.

2018-12-03 18:10:11 UTC  

We need more of that.

2018-12-03 18:11:06 UTC  

As far as the cause is concerned, yeah, but we're also lucky that the antifa were more of the noodle-armed variety, rather than angel dust-addled nutjobs.

2018-12-03 18:12:05 UTC  

As they escalate it pushes normies and government toward our side, my thoughts anyway.

2018-12-03 18:12:15 UTC  

For sure.