Pledge knows what’s up

@Virgil when you fear for your life and feel the people are entrapping your car, then there is a reason.

Nahh man don’t hit people with cars

@Flint If I ever do something like that then I should face the consequences

not sure how this is any different than other cars we have seen hit protestors tho

@Virgil lol sure

@ExternalPepsi Agreed, he shouldn't get the death penalty, that's purely political and a gross miscarriage of justice

I guess we'll see if it is about cars or not when other cases are tried.

other than the not living part

@Virgil Nice to know you'd throw guys under the bus for being the victims of institutional collaboration with anarchists (half way joking here)

Even if there is a T-40 tank rolling down the street behind you. Don’t hit people with your car

@William Russell are you saying he didn’t fear for his life?

I’m saying he shouldn’t have been such a puss if he did

I think he hit over a dozen people

Like they were just there. They weren’t hitting his vehicle

...because his life was in danger, subjectively and probably objectively

guys who are saying "don't hit people with your car": thank you, we're now optically safe and discourage violence--now, can we get back to the grave injustice that was this sham trial?

Yes trail is sham lol

Who was the lawyer that tried to defend him but it was declared a conflict of interest?

and he braked when he realized what his impulse reaction, a reaction from primal instinct, wold result in

Imo manslaughter could have been construed as reasonable, since deaths resulting from unlawful assemblies in a state of emergency are (I believe) counted that way, if you interpret him as having not immediately dispersed (although we do know the truth about the state of emergency as well). But anything beyond manslaughter is without a shadow of a doubt political, and we have to come to terms with the political nature of the court system.

>declared conflict of interest
>the prosecutor and judge are fb friends
>the judge is fb friends with antifa

So “don’t run over people, duh” isn’t really fair

lol

Don’t run over people and expect to continue life normally

@Flint James Fields is not a good martyr. He killed and injured people, certainly his circumstances were unusual but he did what he did. Yes this trial was repugnant, but that does not serve as a retroactive justification for his actions.

'Dont hit people with your car' is the standard in theory and then reality hits with things like a negligent mechanic who made your brakes malfunction, antifa savages pointing firearms at you so you fear for your life, a literal state sponsored riot, and its now actually way harder

@MrBland - VA im looking for that right now

Thanks

Never forget this sham trial is being used to scare people from advocating for their interests.
Do not give in.
Get mad if you must, but use that energy to keep you going

“The don’t hit people with your car” is more ethical than legal

No one is advocating for hitting people with cars @William Russell

I know sorry if I portrayed it that way

Was it the Rutherford institute?

I understand you guys completely

Their greatest weapon is the blackpill, yet it's a weapon that we have the power to immediately disarm

@Virgil good martyr or not has nothing to do with what happened in this trial. JAF, whether you like it or not, is an avatar for *you*. Just like Trump is. How they get treated is how you *will* be treated next

The reason why the people were hit is what I important

Here's the article about his initial lawyers conflict of interest
https://www.dailyprogress.com/news/local/attorney-assigned-to-represent-fields-is-plaintiff-in-statue-removal/article_f68afefc-80fa-11e7-833a-93940dec663a.html

@Virgil if a communist points a weapon at you and you freak out and run away on foot and accidentally run into an old lady while turning a corner and she dies from broken bones, would you hold yourself not just civilly liable, but criminally guilty? I dont want to be harsh but there has to be a moral blame worthiness to justify criminal punishment, not just that an unfortunate accident happened.

There just needs to be varying perspectives otherwise we are just whining lol