no

It is, back then the older camera footage would get destroyed or at least heavily distorted due to radiation in space

That’s why the flag in the footage moves as if there was an atmosphere

no

I’d like to hear your logic

why would they fake footage and actually land

To show people that they landed

they could just fake the footage and not land

No

They landed

i agree there are a lot of missing pieces but i think the landing and footage was real

There was a photo of an astronaut in space that was literally just a mirror image of him in a training session

no

Yes

I’m trina send it rn

This is it

It’s just a mirror image

But that doesn’t mean that they didn’t actually go

They did go

But the footage is fake

At least for the first mission

Time traveler's are just angels in disgusied

no

Why no?

Get out of this chat if you can’t take it seriously

You don’t need to stay

Me?

Yes

But I am serious

Ok

But I think we were probably on the moon before the first mission

Nazis were the first to built rockets that reached space

Depending on how you define the beginning of space

https://youtu.be/dkiKsnWm0JA

iirc it was more expensive to fake a moon landing than to land a real man on the moon.

If it was indeed fake, the Soviets (who had obviously a lot of budget for the KGB and their Space Industry) would have not stopped talking about it, we would be hearing also from these Soviets that Apollo 11 was not real.

The Soviets would have taken advantage of it, which they did not.

Also there is a straight line above the flag to make it look like it's upward.

I provided two pieces of evidence

If you would like to debunk them, go ahead