Message from @Boffin Frog
Discord ID: 456127313776476189
Patrick Little is right on many things, but it isn't being right, it is being able to present your ideas in a way palatable to the general public.
I really doubt that Little is so beneficial to their side that they would prefer him to do his thing rather than shut up
Bad take
Why has he gotten banned on so many platforms
If he's so useful to zog
People who vape shouldn’t be in politics to begin with
You can't be banned from the internet yet
The thing is
These guys aren't exactly wrong about the JQ (though they tend to ignore other issues and blame literally everything on DAS JUDEN which isn't quite right, though it may be one of the biggest issues)
But I do think Nehlen and Little have both been negative forces
He makes Trump supporters and far right people look fucking retarded
That's why zog wants him out there
It's not hard to understand
Yeah, if you say 'well Patrick Little is okay' then you look insane too.
He's a retard who loses his spaghetti at every turn, if you voted for him you should kill yourself.
Patrick J. Buchanan is certainly red pilled on the JQ, Race Realism, issues pertaining to WW2, and I believe someone like him could win in todays political climate...
guy is too old now... obviously
but someone like him could do it...
Jared Taylor should run for congress
Buchanan is like 80, but yeah we need more people along his lines frankly
Problem is
How many are there that could really win offices?
Gen X were all hippies
I'm Gen X
Millennials are all vaping fags
We have to rely on Gen Z
Gen X are your allies
You can't act like a sperg and go out shouting "DA JOOS"
You're trying to get elected
we are skeptical enough to know we've been fed a bunch of BS
(I'm exaggerating, there are like 20 okay people from even the worse gens)
And yeah, Gen X is the least worst of those I listed
Remember normies don't take kindly to that
They're turned off by that
You can dog whistle but your main objective is get elected
I like how Nick tends to say 'the Elites' or whatever
It's more accurate IMO and doesn't scare off 90% of the electorate
That's what you are supposed to do
You can criticize the Jewish influence upon the west in a way that is acceptable to the general public.... take for example Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and his criticism of Jewish influence. Sure some still call him an anti-Semite, but the general consensus is that he is absolutely brilliant...
When it comes to the JQ i think it is best to use dialectic not rhetoric, unless rhetoric is being used against you....
It's really not hard to discuss the jq without autism
Nick Fuentes criticism of the jews is dialectic, little is all rhetoric, and frothing at the mouth, wild eyed rhetoric
obviously comes across as insane
Yep