Message from @Skizerz
Discord ID: 796951721728933899
Or ivanka
🤢🤮
you have any proof does the FBI know why has nothing been done about this????
I can actually see Trump supporters forming their own party and destroying the GOP. The GOP will have to beg to be let in.
Conspiracy theories are only allowed to circulate on the Left.
I love the content... For future reference, we'd still read it without all caps... And please don't wait for an invitation. All perspectives and viewpoints are welcome.
It’s an incomplete court. ACB would have made it 5-4. Also, where is the full opinion? All I saw was who agreed with giving relief and who didn’t
Trump is the man without ideas ... he is a man of style NOT substance
I CANT SEE WITH NO CAPS MAN... BLIND... ok and sorry
It doesn't matter... a ruling is a ruling.
trump has many ideas
It was a stalemate.
@AOH_Assassin If Roberts wanted to overturn it, he would have.
No???
Never mind that was from the 5th
ACB wasn’t on the court, remember that. The disagreement didn’t weigh more than the agreement. A 4-4 ruling did not decide anything
The whitehouse did not blame antifa for the riot
And Russians also hate Biden, to some extent, and they dont think Kamela is a person (more like 3/5th) of a person... so would be interesting if she is president
And to add to that, Russians hate American/US leaders, they dont hate American people
And that wasn’t a hearing on any fraud btw
we have vids of biden being a pedo, georgia election being stolen on camera, doesn't seem to mean anything to these fckn crooks. it's sickening.
Are you 12
Still waiting for an example of an CASE where evidentiary hearing granted by SCOTUS
Was granted *
I think Biden forgot that he was not born in 1920, and kissing babies, and anyone who looks like a baby to him is no longer in fashion
Shhhh, people get upset when you bring this up. Apparently, it looks bad.
@LairdZach, you just advanced to level 9!
PA didn’t grant any evidentiary hearings for fraud
Neither did GA
The Texas case was the pinnacle of hypocrisy. The TX AG was suing the other states for doing the same thing that they had done in TX. The TX Governor extended the date for in person early voting (without involving the legislature) and went out of his way to limit mail-in voting. https://www.texastribune.org/2020/10/07/texas-early-voting-october-13/
Texas seems to have been extremely adept at suppressing the vote. TX and FL both had about 11M ballots cast in the election - TX has 7.5M more residents than FL.
even if you totally disregard the obvious fraud, the breaking of Constitutional law in the swing states was a cut-and-dry case. Scotus ran away. disgusting
Fortunately, their opinions don't really matter to us.
except.... you maybe dont realize that the Texas case wasnt about changes etc... not really... it was about FRANK FRAUD, and ability to discover it if you have a case and can present evidence
@Eden, you just advanced to level 10!
Good read thank you for that...
Hypocritical or not, the constitution was still violated
actually they REALLY do....
That’s not even a fraud case
EO 13848 DNI Report on Election Interference delivered after EC Vote
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/intelligence-analysts-downplayed-election-interference-trump-inspector