Message from @Carlisle

Discord ID: 797008171179704321


2021-01-08 07:39:22 UTC  

Benford's law is an indicator of fraud lol

2021-01-08 07:39:24 UTC  

This is old shit thats been debunked months ago

2021-01-08 07:39:32 UTC  

The defense was "voter dumps" right?

2021-01-08 07:40:32 UTC  

He says in the article he didn't go through the data himself

2021-01-08 07:40:37 UTC  

So what's the point of that

2021-01-08 07:40:44 UTC  

oh it "could be misleading"

2021-01-08 07:42:44 UTC  

Change the c in your name to s

2021-01-08 07:42:56 UTC  

Because the guy who suggested it can be used in fraud

2021-01-08 07:43:04 UTC  

said it doesn't seem out of the ordinary

2021-01-08 07:43:05 UTC  

<:cryingbugman:738000461386350653>

2021-01-08 07:43:07 UTC  

therefore it didn't happen

2021-01-08 07:43:17 UTC  

Pedophile

2021-01-08 07:43:31 UTC  

I love journalists based in Madrid with a masters in Science Communication how credible

2021-01-08 07:43:41 UTC  

If u knew how to read im sure you'd be able to identify why it doesnt apply for reasons other than "it said so"

2021-01-08 07:43:51 UTC  

yeah?

2021-01-08 07:43:51 UTC  

That is literally the defense lmao

2021-01-08 07:44:09 UTC  

Okay

2021-01-08 07:45:35 UTC  

"In this paper I study a statistical method intended to help detect election fraud. Other methods, using regression-based techniques for outlier detection,have previously been proposed to help detect election anomalie"

2021-01-08 07:45:48 UTC  

When his method is applied in this scenario

2021-01-08 07:45:55 UTC  

It comes back with the same rate of detection

2021-01-08 07:46:03 UTC  

but now he is right because he said no?

2021-01-08 08:19:25 UTC  

If you think about it the brain named itself 🤯

2021-01-08 08:33:40 UTC  

If you think about it no one cares